Inciclopedia: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
imported>AbominableIntelligence
(→‎External links: domain change, replaced: dramatica.se → dramatica.rs)
imported>DarkDelegation
No edit summary
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Spics}}
[[Image:Inciclopedia.png|center|This is their logo, everyone can edit it! Just like ED.]]
[[Image:Inciclopedia.png|center|This is their logo, everyone can edit it! Just like ED.]]
[[Image:tio1.jpg|thumb|[[wut|Their version of a meme. This guy appears in 99% of sysops very very very... shitty articles. It must be a any sysop from there familiar, because nobody knows who is until now and they are too stupid to find someone like that...]]]]
[[Image:tio1.jpg|thumb|[[wut|Their version of a meme. This guy appears in 99% of sysops very very very... shitty articles. It must be a any sysop from there familiar, because nobody knows who is until now and they are too stupid to find someone like that...]]]]
Line 4: Line 5:
[[Image:Inciclopedia notable pic.jpg|thumb|200px|This is one of Inciclopedia's notable pictures. I didn't smile either.]]
[[Image:Inciclopedia notable pic.jpg|thumb|200px|This is one of Inciclopedia's notable pictures. I didn't smile either.]]


'''Inciclopedia''' is the Spanish language version of [[Uncyclopedia]]. It's a complete and utter [[failure]] of a site, because Spanish is only spoken by [[You|faggots and mexiniggers]].
'''Inciclopedia''' is the Spanish language version of [[Uncyclopedia]]. It is a complete and utter [[failure]] of a site, because Spanish is only spoken by [[You|faggots and mexiniggers]].


Since the articles are so damn long, they will undoubtedly bore you to death. In fact, the sysops encourage you to write relentlessly; you may create the most perfect article, so to speak, but the faggot sysops will always bring invented pretexts hinting at standards, so it'll be [[Criteria for Speedy Deletion|immediately assraped]].
Since the articles are so damn long, they will undoubtedly bore you to death. In fact, the faggot sysops encourage you to write relentlessly. You may create the most perfect article, so to speak, but the sysops will always bring invented pretexts hinting at standards, so it'll be [[Criteria for Speedy Deletion|immediately assraped]].


Actually, Inciclopedia is so boring it doesn't inspire you to vandalize it. It kills any stimulation of the mind or emotions. Only the [[Dramacrat|truly depraved]] or the [[13-year-old boy|jobless]] would do it. So go for it and [[profit]].
Actually, Inciclopedia is so boring it doesn't inspire you to vandalize it. The content kills any stimulation of the mind or emotions. Only the [[Dramacrat|truly depraved]] or the [[13-year-old boy|jobless]] would do it. So go for it and [[profit]].


At some point in 2008, Inciclopedia was in a net-war with Wikipediars, a kind of ED humor-styled Wikipedia from [[Chile]]. They hate each other but they are both crap. No one cared, obviously.
At some point in 2008, Inciclopedia was in a net-war with Wikipediars, a kind of ED humor-styled Wikipedia from [[Chile]]. They hate each other but they are both crap. No one cared, obviously.


==Magnificent Features==
==Magnificent features==


* Jokes that only a [[gay]] would understood on every article.
* Jokes that only a [[gay]] would understood on every article.
Line 56: Line 57:


== Who created this [[crap]]?? ==
== Who created this [[crap]]?? ==
Inciclopedia is the epitome of [[unfunny]], just like actually Uncyclopedia. Actually, it's epically [[shitty]]. No, wait. It's scrumtrulescently fucked. Inciclopedians know it and try to justify the damn thing with templates like [[fail|"This article has a lot of humor only understood by usual readers of Inciclopedia..."]] When you see something like that in a parody site, you know that there is real trouble and that you should be [[fapping|doing something more constructive]].  
Inciclopedia is the epitome of [[unfunny]], just like its english counterpart, Uncyclopedia. Actually, it's epically [[shitty]]. No, wait. It's scrumtrulescently fucked. Inciclopedians know it and try to justify the damn thing with templates like [[fail|"This article has a lot of humor only understood by usual readers of Inciclopedia..."]] When you see something like that in a parody site, you know that there is real trouble and that you should be [[fapping|doing something more constructive]].  


But the [[Completely irrelevant history|big question remains]]: Who created Inciclopedia?
But the [[Completely irrelevant history|big question remains]]: Who created Inciclopedia?
Line 62: Line 63:
* Maybe a Spic [[B|/b/]] user, trying to imitate [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] and failing? <br/>
* Maybe a Spic [[B|/b/]] user, trying to imitate [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]] and failing? <br/>
* Maybe an [[emo]] fag? <br/>
* Maybe an [[emo]] fag? <br/>
* [[Jimbo Wales|The great pornographer]]?
* [[Jimbo Wales|The Great Pornographer]]?
* Some [[Angela Beesley|fugly chick]]?
* Some [[Angela Beesley|fugly chick]]?
* [[You]]?
* [[You]]?
Line 97: Line 98:
* [http://inciclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/IN:O Terrorist Cast] (sysops)
* [http://inciclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/IN:O Terrorist Cast] (sysops)
* [http://gamerfan.wordpress.com/category/inciclopedia/ An Inciclopedian's writings about his sexual obsession with the Inciclopedia]
* [http://gamerfan.wordpress.com/category/inciclopedia/ An Inciclopedian's writings about his sexual obsession with the Inciclopedia]
 
* [https://inciclopedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_Dramatica Inciclopedia article about ED]


{{wikis}}
{{wikis}}

Navigation menu