This is starting to turn into a really good article DoNotWant 00:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't get it
Is this just one website using ED to damage the reputation of another? And is meepsheep an admin? Because... that's not what ED is for. --Derpcat 02:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
It started with .net people using ED to make themselves look good, and generaly make butthurt revisions. Then it went further when they did something to piss off the ownership of ED (which resulted in their host being raped)--Kashiwaba Tomoe 08:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Ah, I see. That makes sense, I guess. Is NekoArc one of those 4chon peoople? Because its basically just you and him editing the page. I looked through the history and none of those other 4chon people made edits other than the ones that honestly weren't really vandalism but got reverted as such. --Derpcat 10:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
I don't know what you mean by "4chon" people, however I am suspicious about your account. Why have your only edits been on this talk page? This leads me to assume you yourself are from 4chon.net and have come here to whine about the article.
Fake derpcat is fake --NekoArc 14:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
I mean people from this 4chon website. Who else would I be talking about? Also, I made an account so I could fix things here and there, nothing's come up yet other than this page. Look at me having to explain myself while not having done anything, paranoia like yours will drive people away. Not cool at all. --Derpcat 16:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Also, someone was mad enough to remove the following file and did a few edits on another page A friendly staff member chatting it up. You also keep mentioniong "4chon people" yet you fail to mention which one. To answer your first question, NOPE.avi. If it wasn't for them advertising on my site and doing other shit (including pissing people here off because of bawwfaggotry), this article probably wouldn't be here. --NekoArc 01:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
What do you mean which one? Clearly I'm talking about people from the website this article is about. I thought you were from 4chon? There's only one other 4chon and that one is just a dead board. So the page is just retaliation for advertising on your site? Why don't you just add that someone from 4chon advertised on your site to the article rather than making silly lies that even someone who is not familiar with the website can see through? And why is meepsheep, one of the admins involved in this drama? Back on the real ED it was the admin's job to revert and stop edit warring, not join in and take sides. Also, if we're so against people using ED to raise awareness for sites they own or use, why is the entire bokuchan article written by Kashiwaba Tomoe? What the fuck, guys? This is not how ED is supposed to be at all. --Derpcat 17:45, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Back on the real ED it was the admin's job to revert and stop edit warring, not join in and take sides. Errrr, when exactly did this happen? --zaiger(talk) 04:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
When meepsheep banned all those people making legitimate edits. Seriously, if you're not going to take your responsibilities seriously at least try to keep it quiet rather than advertising it in the article. --Derpcat 11:59, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
You mean the people vandalizing the article by blanking sections and removing other content? Even TOW bans for that.
I don't see one user banned for making legitimate edits, maybe you could give some examples? --zaiger(talk) 16:03, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Well there's that guy Jayzee who has half the page dedicated to him. http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Special:Contributions/JayZee Then there's the shit meepsheep just did to my userpage. Like I said, if you're going to be corrupt at least make some sort of attempt at being discreet about it. It really saddens me because this was supposed to be ED's one last chance of survival, and admins like meepsheep don't take their responsibilities seriously and ruin it for everyone. --Derpcat 15:49, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Oh, I'm sorry. Would you rather ED provide free advertisement for your shitty *chan website? ED is NOT a nsfw version of know your meme. ED is not for *chan boards to advertise. You seriously do not get it do you? Let me try to explain how things around here work. First off, understand that cubic time is truth. You are educated stupid by your governments and schools to believe there is one day, when there is really four. ALL MATH IS WRONG, ALL NUMBERS EQUAL ZERO! MAN IS PERSONIFIED PYRAMID; THE HEAD IS MADE OF FOUR CORNERS - TWO, EARS NOSE, AND BACK CORNER. A MOTHER AND A BABY ARE THE SAME AGE: 16 YEARS OLD!
So instead of addressing my concerns you're just going to get butthurt and claim I'm advertising 4chon? NEWS FLASH: I'm not from 4chon! If you really have to resort to untrue ad hominem arguments it just goes to show how wrong you are, how little you care about ED and how much you love flaunting your power. R.I.P. ED --Derpcat 18:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
LOL DERPCAT BUTTHURT. --Kashiwaba Tomoe 20:30, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
All of derpcat's edits are on this page. His only intention is trying to suck cock to try to make his site look good. I lol'd at 'R.I.P. ED' esp since this site is getting over 2 million views a day. That reminds me, how's boycotting ED going? Not very well I take? --NekoArc 20:56, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
I've already explained why all my edits are on this page, but I'm guessing your thinking is "ignore what he says and repeat repeat repeat". Yeah, its great that a website with some resemblance to ED is popular, but this isn't ED. It could have been, but it isn't. All the views in the world aren't going to change that. And when did I ever say I wanted to boycott ED? --Derpcat 21:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Just fixing up some on the IRC Logs
You see, some of the Chat logs on this article are redacted, even contradiciting other articles that have the same logs on them. So I hope you don't mind me fixing them up for you guys<3 --FlutterShy 08:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
All done ----
There was no redaction done to those logs, I know casue I posted a number of them. At most random lines of conversation unrelated to the issue were removed. --Kashiwaba Tomoe 10:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
