Talk:Xat
in before faggots crying over protection --Kashiwaba Tomoe 22:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- I only full protected cuz semi doesn't work atm. Dropped Ryan a memo on IRC so he can fix --TKN 22:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Xat sucks dicks.
Ziron
Got a fuckton of dirt on Ziron,he's worse than we thought. It's actually gotten to the point where I'm forced to write an entire article about him.
dicks
dicks everywhere
Cleanup
This article is just a list of irrelevant faggots, can someone turn it into a decent page? 
00:08, 28 October 2011 (CEST)
- This whole "Well known lolcow" list is pretty much bullshit, since there's no well known anything on xat, just Shit Nobody cares about, it's just faggots like Special:Contributions/XSyko trying for petty revenge. I'd rewrite it, but I'd feel I'd be overstepping my bounds by deleting fucking everything on the list of users. Mike the Great 04:04, 19 January 2012 (CET)
- This article is seriously shit. You can't track anyone on Xat.. this is fucking pointless. TylerRosenow º Ӕ talk º ✉ 23:57, 19 January 2012 (CET)
- Xat is full of lulz and drama, it's just not milked properly. I know I'm new, but let me have a go at completely re-writing it. Leave it protected and I'll try and see if I can help.Mike the Great 06:25, 20 January 2012 (CET)
Xat continues
And there's still more shitstorm. In addition to the above: Mike has a point; xat does have a potential for some decent lulz. Being Xat, though, it can have mixed results. Some of the chats are pretty funny and causing a drama to unfold can be as simple as saying: 'There is no god. I have proof', but some of these chats seriously are to be avoided or at least taken seriously. On one occasion, I actually felt like I was about to have a fit because one of the chats I tried to troll creeped me out so much. My point is: Xat should be kept as an article and used, but be careful what you get up to.