Talk:Pedophilia: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Glitchedblood
(Protected "Talk:Pedophilia" ([Edit=Allow only EDitors] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only EDitors] (indefinite)))
Line 18: Line 18:


--<b>[[User:Onideus|Onideus]]</b> [[File:Sig_Rainbow_Clouds.png|link=Shitting_Rainbows]] 17:02, 26 January 2013 (EST)
--<b>[[User:Onideus|Onideus]]</b> [[File:Sig_Rainbow_Clouds.png|link=Shitting_Rainbows]] 17:02, 26 January 2013 (EST)
== FOR THE RECORD..How wikipedia/wiki-pedo-ia/wiki-pee-doia operates... as inside agents since 2005...I know all there is... wikipedia hides its crimes, using all inclusinve policy allows - you can write about PEDOPHILES... THERE ARE 1000S OF ARTICLES ON GROWN UP MEN FUCKING LIL BOYS AND LIL GIRLS... ==
THESE BASTARDS aka senior editors HAVE 1000000000000 EDITS AND THEY USE THAT TO THEIR ADVANTAGE ACROSS WIKIS...OVER TIME TRASH GAIN CONVIDENCE, SO NO MATTER HOW ERONG THEY ARE THEIR EDITS WILL STAY  (XXblackburn/cat, javaHurricane, antandrus the felon stalker, leonidlednev, dannyS712, vermont, ehrlich91,dungodung et al) AND OHTER BLIND WIKITRASH WILL FOLLOW..WIKIPEDIA: WHERE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...AND FUCK THE SAINTS TOO IS THEIR IDEOLOGY:
POPE JP2 GRADUATED HS WITH FLYING COLORS ON MAY 14 1938... BUT SOME FAGGOT DID NOT LIKE IT,SO IT WAS TAKEN DOWN...THEY EVEN BLACKLSITED GREAT SAINT BUT THIS IS ONLY ONE SAMPLE OUT OF MANY..BUT ENOUGH OF ME WASTING TIME ON SHITTY,INGRATE ED ON SAME LEVEL OF WIKISCUM ETERNAL!
archive.is/XSEXQ
simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pope_John_Paul_II&action=history&offset=&limit=500
wiki-PEDO-ia: world's top place for pedophiles gatherings; WIKIPEDOIA IS BASED ON PORN AS JIMBO STARTED WITH BOMIS HARDCORE PORN SITE, THUS HIS NAME JIM-BO(MIS):
ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/wikipedia-has-a-long-history-of-problems/ AND GROWING EXPONENTIALLY EVERY DAY, ESPECIALLY IT'S UTMOST WIKICULTURE OF UTMOST WIKIGNORANCE, WIKIARROGANCE!!!
https://www.pcworld.com/article/525199/the_15_biggest_wikipedia_blunders.html WIKIPEDIA ENORMOUS MISTAKES, OF COURSE - THE USUAL nbcnews.com/id/wbna32588168 wikipedia GARB'A'GE "encyclopedia" collossal mistakes = THANKS TO BLIND, STUPID EDTORS AND USELESS ADMINISTRATORS
www.thestreet.com/personal-finance/credit-cards/does-wikipedia-have-dirty-secret-12805865 WIKIMEDIA MAY HAVE DIRTY IMAGES OF LIL CHILDREN BEING RAPED? DUH, THEY HAVE TONS OF THEM!!!
www.foxnews.com/tech/exclusive-pedophiles-find-a-home-on-wikipedia  like @jimbo Wales @jeff G. @tuvalkin et al @elcobolla from shitty commons
www.opindia.com/2020/08/larry-sanger-wikipedia-wikimedia-commons-hosted-paedophilic-pornography-content
www.foxnews.com/tech/wikipedia-abandons-efforts-to-purge-porn-from-online-encyclopedia wikipedoia abandons going after pedophiles, of course, they are the pedophiles

Revision as of 14:09, 9 July 2024

Pedophilia Discussion

Somebody should start an interesting discussion on this page.

Let's bait all the pedos on here. You got nothing to lose from confessing.

PwnWinFail 04:52, 19 January 2013 (EST)PwnWinFail

Pedo-Stache Section

Added a new section! I'm actually surprised this wasn't added a long time ago, considering how common-place the term has become. I was inspired to create the section after encountering one "Joey Pierce" on FB. After making various threats of physical violence against me for making fun of his mother (srsly), one Liz Pierce, I was compelled to check out lil Joey's photo albums...which, at the time (and possibly still are) were completely molested with hundreds of pictures of his son "Cru", about a third of which were all nudie/bathtub style shots...and keep in mind PUBLICLY posted/shared. I also came across a number of different text gems, like the one I uploaded, where he talks about the reactions his pedo-stache gets when he's in public. Rather than create an entire article for the kooky nut job, which quite frankly I haven't the bother nor the inclination for, I decided it would simply be easier to add a new subsection to the pedo article and effectively nail multiple pedos with one article so to speak. Uh, that one guy though, Robert Young, he's probably worth an entire article.

Some horrific reading (there's several dozen more articles on this story too):

http://www.news4jax.com/news/Mother-testifies-she-didn-t-report-sex-abuse-because-she-didn-t-care/-/475880/16841152/-/bcc4i9z/-/index.html

http://www.justice4caylee.org/t12874-jane-perry-younger-than-12-accused-robert-going-young-and-michael-anthony-halveland-jacksonville-fl

Tha'fawk... *shudder* Gawd damn filthy pedos. `, \

--Onideus 17:02, 26 January 2013 (EST)

FOR THE RECORD..How wikipedia/wiki-pedo-ia/wiki-pee-doia operates... as inside agents since 2005...I know all there is... wikipedia hides its crimes, using all inclusinve policy allows - you can write about PEDOPHILES... THERE ARE 1000S OF ARTICLES ON GROWN UP MEN FUCKING LIL BOYS AND LIL GIRLS...

THESE BASTARDS aka senior editors HAVE 1000000000000 EDITS AND THEY USE THAT TO THEIR ADVANTAGE ACROSS WIKIS...OVER TIME TRASH GAIN CONVIDENCE, SO NO MATTER HOW ERONG THEY ARE THEIR EDITS WILL STAY (XXblackburn/cat, javaHurricane, antandrus the felon stalker, leonidlednev, dannyS712, vermont, ehrlich91,dungodung et al) AND OHTER BLIND WIKITRASH WILL FOLLOW..WIKIPEDIA: WHERE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...AND FUCK THE SAINTS TOO IS THEIR IDEOLOGY:

POPE JP2 GRADUATED HS WITH FLYING COLORS ON MAY 14 1938... BUT SOME FAGGOT DID NOT LIKE IT,SO IT WAS TAKEN DOWN...THEY EVEN BLACKLSITED GREAT SAINT BUT THIS IS ONLY ONE SAMPLE OUT OF MANY..BUT ENOUGH OF ME WASTING TIME ON SHITTY,INGRATE ED ON SAME LEVEL OF WIKISCUM ETERNAL!

archive.is/XSEXQ

simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pope_John_Paul_II&action=history&offset=&limit=500

wiki-PEDO-ia: world's top place for pedophiles gatherings; WIKIPEDOIA IS BASED ON PORN AS JIMBO STARTED WITH BOMIS HARDCORE PORN SITE, THUS HIS NAME JIM-BO(MIS): ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/wikipedia-has-a-long-history-of-problems/ AND GROWING EXPONENTIALLY EVERY DAY, ESPECIALLY IT'S UTMOST WIKICULTURE OF UTMOST WIKIGNORANCE, WIKIARROGANCE!!! https://www.pcworld.com/article/525199/the_15_biggest_wikipedia_blunders.html WIKIPEDIA ENORMOUS MISTAKES, OF COURSE - THE USUAL nbcnews.com/id/wbna32588168 wikipedia GARB'A'GE "encyclopedia" collossal mistakes = THANKS TO BLIND, STUPID EDTORS AND USELESS ADMINISTRATORS www.thestreet.com/personal-finance/credit-cards/does-wikipedia-have-dirty-secret-12805865 WIKIMEDIA MAY HAVE DIRTY IMAGES OF LIL CHILDREN BEING RAPED? DUH, THEY HAVE TONS OF THEM!!! www.foxnews.com/tech/exclusive-pedophiles-find-a-home-on-wikipedia like @jimbo Wales @jeff G. @tuvalkin et al @elcobolla from shitty commons www.opindia.com/2020/08/larry-sanger-wikipedia-wikimedia-commons-hosted-paedophilic-pornography-content www.foxnews.com/tech/wikipedia-abandons-efforts-to-purge-porn-from-online-encyclopedia wikipedoia abandons going after pedophiles, of course, they are the pedophiles