Web of Trust: Difference between revisions

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigationJump to search
1,653 bytes added ,  11 September 2015
no edit summary
imported>LmaoZedong
No edit summary
imported>UltraSleuth
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:wotlogo.png|right|thumb|Web of Trust, ruining browsing since 2006]]
[[Image:wotlogo.png|right|thumb|Web of Trust, ruining browsing since 2006]]
Web of Trust ([[Wut|WOT]]) is an add-on for [[Firefox]] and [[Google Ultron|Chrome]] browsers. Its supposed to help your security by saying you what websites are safe and which ones [[Virus|not]], basically its an alternative to [[Google|Jewgle]] warnings, but even more annoying and [[Lulz|lulzy]].
Web of Trust ([[Wut|WOT]]) is an add-on for [[Firefox]] and [[Google Ultron|Chrome]] browsers. its an alternative to [[Google|Jewgle]] warnings, but even more annoying and [[Lulz|lulzy]].  


While it's supposed to help your security by saying you what websites are safe and which ones [[Virus|not]], in reality the site serves as little more than a propaganda machine hijacked by [[leftist]]s, [[SJW]]s and other degenerates as a means of deterring people from visiting any website that Al Sharpton or the Southern Poverty Law Center might find offensive, along with smaller segments of far-righters and other extremists and [[no life|no-lifers]] pursuing similar agendas (such as [[Pirate Bay]] fanbois using it to troll the [[RIAA]]'s website).
Despite the site having multiple rating categories such as "vendor reliability" and "child safety" with ratings ranging from green (good) to red (bad), in reality any site which the activist freaks don't like will be given a "red" rating in every category even when they make no sense. A site like [[Fox News]] or [[Scientology]]'s official website or some backwater [[creationist]] website will receive a negative rating in child safety despite hosting no porn, or a negative rating in "vendor reliability" despite not selling jack shit.
What's even more ironic is that websites like [[Wikipedia]] end up with positive ratings in every category including child safety, despite TOW hosting images of everything from blowjobs to rape victims' corpses. Sadder still is that the site staff doesn't give a shit about it and absolves itself of responsibility by declaring the site a "mobocracy" and that "truth" is simply what the community "decides" it is (meaning a great way to troll them would be for people to go to WOT's own reputation page and downvote it in every category, along with a few comments claiming that hosts child porn - because then it would be "true" right?).


== How to use it ==
== How to use it ==
Line 32: Line 38:
{{Softwarez}}
{{Softwarez}}
[[Category:Softwarez]]
[[Category:Softwarez]]
[[Category:Social Justice]]
Anonymous user

Navigation menu