Talk:Alyssa Rosales

Just a theory

Just wanted to point out there are actually two videos of separate occasions. This means that not only has she fucked the dog at least twice, but had it videoed at least twice. It seems to me the bet she lost was about uploading the videos, not fucking the dog - something she seems to do on at least a semi-regular basis. There is proof of this, but I don't really want to link to bestiality. --Shutupman 23:53, 30 January 2013 (EST)

I find it odd...

...that the sick fucks who dwell here have pics of dracoguard presenting his ass to Broccoli Dog but we draw the line when it's with this chick. I wonder. Is it because Dracoguard is an unfuckable ginger that makes it acceptable? Or is it the fact that Ms. Rosales is...kind of fuckable that makes it weird in this context? Opinions? Turbogook

No other edits to the page has been made (like a sysop adding the banner). I don't think it is a decision made by the ED users. So the only explanation is OP is a idiot who has a weak stomach. ED hosts worse things than a dog fucking a woman. NOTpolyanna 16:36, 1 February 2013 (EST)

EDIT: Oh shit i looked at the wrong history page zaiger put up the banner. Sorry i am leaving my original message here for you to laugh. Well about your question Dracoguard gone on and on about how he saved his dog and other shit that proved him a hypocrite and a dumbass when the photos surfaced. This is just a woman wants to get famous like the tampon-sucking girl. NOTpolyanna 17:55, 1 February 2013 (EST)

Understandable. Why not help her become famous? Tampon sucker has her pics here, and He Who Shall Not Be Named has well...everything about him on this glorious site. Yes, I know that He Who Shall Not Be Named didn't want the fame either, but i'm sure that dogfucker here would love the attention the cops give her...and the rest of society. Besides you can link the shit, you don't have to put it in a viewable window. But then, I suppose zaiger wants to prevent sick fuck fappery. Course, this goal is futile because well, look at the shota page and tell me someone hasn't fapped to that once. Turbogook

Well, the shota page is more sick than this shit. And you make a good point, no need to show the video just a link and a explanation like "here is the sick bitch fucking her dog" would suffice. I don't think zaiger's worried about sick fucks or any other shit like legal issues. Maybe this doesn't hold shock value for zaiger and other editors and they don't want brain dead furries here looking for bestiality porn. IDK, i could be blindly making up shit. NOTpolyanna 14:59, 3 February 2013 (EST)

Beat Around The Bush

it's illegal to post animal sex almost like it's illegal to post child pornography other wise we would show it all uncensored. GTFO of here with that stupid false validation attempt for us having better standards. life is raw, and fucked up. this site helps put us in perspective until you faggits beat around the bush. Be honest, and just say it's illegal so we won't show the video.

I just want to ad that girl is fucking hot, wifey material. Look her up she has a web cam website with a ton of pics. To bad her vagina is public property.

jujitsu

we're pretty clear about it being gray area (ie, not illegal everywhere) to post zoophilia. we are not furaffinity. ♥♥♥ 11:19, 4 February 2013 (EST)

Well then, the shota page should be nuked entirely, along with loli, guro, and the dracoguard page. All that shit is illegal. In fact, just save a step and nuke the whole thing. Just to be safe. -sarcasm- Turbogook 15:33, 4 February 2013 (EST)

A lot of pages need to be nuked if we are talking about illegal stuff (i am not complaining about illegal shit, just making an observation). But this is internet drama, EDs main goal is to document it. Didn't we took the sweden domain just for hosting this stuff? What happens a month later, when this bitch goes to court and people wants to see what this is all about? NOTpolyanna 17:59, 4 February 2013 (EST)

Why don't you focus on the actual words in the article before sperging over there being no bestiality. The opening paragraph in this article is terrible. --zaiger (talk) 22:07, 5 April 2013 (EDT)

Clarification

Why would Dracoguard's and Mr. Hands' be graced with depictions of their faptastic experiences with animals if we shouldn't depict it here? Miyagi 09:34, 6 February 2013 (EST)

I'd bring that up at Encyclopedia Dramatica:Thizzlehat Junction Center ♥♥♥ 09:42, 6 February 2013 (EST)

I have a theory. It says that the question isn't legal, as pointed by NOTpolyanna, nor it's ethical (because this site is precisely about that, about not censoring)It's about the personal tastes of some admins. When, for example, Zaiger sees something that he finds disgusting and falls into the category of thing that are "politically correct to censor even inside a wiki that seeks the politically incorect as a model", he doesn't doubt to forbid it.

The guro, shota etc pages, as they are as they are from long ago, and no admin has to approve them , magically are legal and pose no legal threat to the wiki. But right now if the shota page didn't exist, and I wanted to make it, I probably will get censored and lectured about the perils of uploading CP to the wiki blablabla.

And obviously that even posting a link, instead of the vid itself, makes you banhammered is beyond pathetic, imho. Let's take a look at the banner: sick fuck posted a video of herself fucking a dog. We at ED DO NOT WANT TO SEE THAT SHIT! That's not an admin doing his work here, that's a thraumatized soul venting his moral indignation, or something, lol...and I must ask: is this the proper site to do that? Srly.

What about that plan of bringing this up to the TJC, btw?--Chzoronzon 04:21, 4 March 2013 (EST)

Completely made up article

This 'Alyssa Rosales' is actually a previously contributing BeastForum member, and is a professional Zoo model. Goes by the name CannibalCupcake or similar, and has a Tumblr called ViewofaZoo (about pro-zoophillia). The whole thing about losing a bet isn't true, some trolls had put it up on Facebook and created some fake story around a seemingly standard beastiality video. Mr Bean 09:19, 16 February 2013 (EST)

A completly made-up article on ED? Say it isn't so! - Mr.Jonzz 09:27, 16 February 2013 (EST)

But what's the point of one based on "drama" that never actually occurred? To me, it sounds like some zoofag couldn't afford to sign up to the bestiality websites she's on so has decided to make shit up. Mr Bean 09:57, 16 February 2013 (EST)

Well fix it to reflect the true state of affairs then fgt, idc. - Mr.Jonzz 10:03, 16 February 2013 (EST)

lol You have a article on animal sex, yet, you don't post the video, which is fine, I don't want to see it either. Lazarus

just fyi

linking to the video is fine. also if you add screenshots in the form of SFW Porn that might make everyone happy. --zaiger (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2013 (EDT)

lol'd irl at the thought of the vid/screencaps being SFW porn'd. :D hipcrime 22:42, 5 April 2013 (EDT)