Talk:My Little Pony/2012-Jan-Mar

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January

Just saying

I'd just like to take the time to say that all bronies are faggots and you should stop editing this article. ~Oblique 04:12, 2 January 2012 (CET)

Don't split the article

A Brony article would make a strong page but an article about the show alone won't. Let me put it to you this way: Do you see how Twitards and Narutards have an article of their own, and so do Twilight and Naruto? This is because both the fandom and movies/books/show are notable enough.

I say we just rename this article "Bronies" or "Ponyfags", keep the actual show sections as brief as possible, and only focus on the fandom because the show itself isn't that lulzworthy. Gray 04:50, 2 January 2012 (CET)

  • Eh, I guess you're right. Now that the article isn't being assaulted by slack-jawed retards as often there really isn't a need to split it anymore. --RTD 07:20, 2 January 2012 (CET)
  • I think the name is fine as it is; it's what people are going to search the most and the article is about the forced meme as much as it is about the people behind it.           <re-insert> Otherwise I agree, the article is going to look idiotic if it just rants about the show with little to no context/internet relevance. – NuclearDuckie 01:58, 5 January 2012 (CET)
The reason why the article doesn't have much about the actual show because there is nothing to actually discuss. It's just a normal show that somehow managed to get a bunch of perverted in denial furfags coming out of the woodwork. Lord Tony 14:26, 5 January 2012 (CET)
  • If the page is renamed (preferably after the fans), "My Little Pony" can always redirect to it. I just find it weird that the article is named after the show when it clearly focuses on its fans. ~Gray 02:23, 6 January 2012 (CET)
  • I don't know, I feel like the subject of the internet spamming should take preference over whatever title the perpetrators dub themselves. Calling the article "Bronies" would almost be like paying respect to them, where they clearly don't deserve it. Plus it would sound like something that ought to be a subsection of the Furries article, when the general internet consensus is that My Little Pony is a meme in its own "right". I hate KnowYourMeme as much as anyone, and I don't mean to set store by what they perceive as an internet phenomenon, but I honestly think you'd have a hard time defining "Bronies" without at least some general background information. – NuclearDuckie 13:14, 7 January 2012 (CET)
  • No, it's fine at My Little Pony. Look up Sonic the hedgehog and get sonicfags in the article, etc. Besides calling the article "bronies" is just what they want. It'd be better to call them ponies or ponyfags. Lord Tony 19:56, 7 January 2012 (CET)
  • Honestly, I think this article should be renamed "Bronies". The show isn't a source or phenomenon of internet drama, but the fanbase is. I'm obviously not the only one who has that opinion since the article is mainly about the fanbase. I know you don't want to use the word "Bronies" since it would, in a way, pay respect to the fanbase and its "dialect" (a practice that is generally avoided on this wiki), but the word "ponyfags" is even worse since it's obviously just a way to get around saying "Bronies". So, the non-usage of the word "Bronies" sticks out rather obviously and would pay even more respect to the fanbase. But since I'm a fan of the show who does not like the term "Brony" at all, my opinion might not be worth anything. Think about it anyway. Nixitur 08:41, 8 January 2012 (CET)

(Reset indent) AFAIK most of the fans on 4chan (/co/, anyway) prefer to be called "ponyfags" to distinguish them from people on sites like Ponychan or EqD, whom they see as the cancer. (—and also I presume because "-fag" titles are common on 4chan and that would imply some sort of acceptance.) So I just use whatever term makes me throw up the least in my mouth. But I stand by my argument; you need to know what My Little Pony is before you can discuss the fans. And I know most people who look it up here are aware of the phenomenon or are at least familiar with the brand name, but this is an Encyclopædia, after all – it serves to present information in a logical manner. – NuclearDuckie 15:28, 8 January 2012 (CET)

Actually, I've had a slight change of heart about this. At least, if it happened that some of the show's fans got completely out of control like so many furry autists do, it would help to have a "Bronies" page in order to lump these people together, whether or not they had articles to themselves. There we could give an overview of the general drama caused by the fandom, and keep the original "My Little Pony" page as merely a concise history of how it came to be, along with an "ALERT: THIS IS A FORCED MEME" stamped to the top. Not yet, however. – NuclearDuckie 06:50, 22 January 2012 (CET)

MasterYubel; someone needs some mental help.

Lord Tony 02:25, 7 January 2012 (CET)

My fucking god. The fanfic and the art make my eyes bleed. Twilight Moon Sparkle? OH GOD SOMEONE FUCKING SAVE ME NOW --ChaosSoldier1 07:20, 7 January 2012 (CET)ChaosSoldier1

In 20 seconds, this userpage has damaged me more than 3 years of ED and 4Chan combined. There is no god. --RTD 08:52, 7 January 2012 (CET)

Ladies and gentlemen, the Chasethehedgehog of the My Little Pony fandom has been found.--HyperPeanut 09:26, 7 January 2012 (CET)

I agree, this article definitely needs sum moar fine examples of this guys art. He's a good representation of the brony babyfur mindset. --Buttseks 01:28, 12 February 2012 (EST)

"Brony Dialect"

The section about the brony dialect is really very unfunny. It's pretty much just a collection of facts with very little humor, except some lines in the "typical neighings" section. In fact, I don't think it needs to be there at all. Unless anyone can modify the explanations of some phrases of the "brony dialect" to make them more funny or offensive (which, let's face it, is pretty much the same), there is absolutely no point for it to be there. Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to make it funny (or, at least, I don't know how), so, again, does it need to be there? Nixitur 08:41, 8 January 2012 (CET)

I was about to delete it but then someone would probably undo it and then someone would undo that and then we are back to more edit wars. Lord Tony 12:26, 8 January 2012 (CET)
A few minutes ago in a wiki far far away from Murka
EDIT WARS
Yep i can pretty much imagine what would happen if they did do so
Esther❥Nguyen 12:29, 8 January 2012 (CET)
Fuck it, I deleted them anyways. I would edit parts of it but it's unsalvageable. Lord Tony 18:54, 8 January 2012 (CET)
Honestly, I assumed we were just going to make that section kind of srs. There was no way to make it funny, like, at all. Unless you made all of the terms pipe to "faggot" or "rimjobs". Also Tony, I think you meant, 'un'salvageable. --RTD 22:46, 9 January 2012 (CET)

The Completely Srss Area For Completely Srss Discussion

All joking aside. Why has MLP become so popular? I started watching the show a few months ago to see if i could help make this article, and in my for reals, unbiased, cartoon-loving opinion, it's not that great. Slightly above mediocre, but nothing beyond that, just your standard children's cartoon. Bright colors, intermittent humor, quirky animation, normal kid's affair. Not as good as Tom & Jerry, PPG, or Adventure Time, but not as bad as most of the trite on TV nowadays. Yet people gab on about it on forums and travel hundreds of miles to attend a convention for it. GG humanity. Also, I'm curious, without fear of judgement from other EDiots, what do you guys honestly think of the show? --RTD 08:21, 15 January 2012 (CET)

There are many factors. Well there is Lauren Faust, anything she touches is popular.Hipsters jumped on board because adults don't get why a 15 year old male would like it. Closet furries came in because they can be known as bronies rather than a furry. A random unfunny 4chan fag kept posting the same shit until people starting to find it funny. Normal furries love the show itself. Lord Tony 23:44, 15 January 2012 (CET)
It originated from 4chan where things fucking explode. You can say that it was thought of a troll with the whole constant posting until it deviated to them actually watching the show and enjoying it. My Little Pony, I'll admit that I do enjoy their episodes along with other cartoons, doesn't really introduce anything special. Their messages have been incorporated into other cartoons and animes way before it even aired; it just happens to feature horses. I would dare to say it's because of the archetypes of the main cast, but it's definitely not new.
Take away the fanbase and the article would look like nothing but some exhibit C article, that's my problem. MLP is more about its fandom than it is the show because it's the fandom that does this shit. Compare it to Death Note or Family Guy; they have more drama that their fanbase isn't responsible for which warranted them an article. -- 00:07, 16 January 2012 (CET)
Understandable, but I think I gotta' go with your hipster theory, Halcy. I can comprehend watching it, as I said, it's a decent show, but why else would grown-ass men spend all day talking about a particular cartoon even though there are far superior programs available that aren't geared towards a completely different demo? Besides Brain Asphyxia of course... --RTD 01:00, 18 January 2012 (CET)
You can also add the fact that it's a remake of a line of toys. Theoretically if it was a completely new series (no horses or old franchises) there would be no doubt in my mind that it would be ignored. The fact that it's a remake (and generally considered well done for being one) is what lead it to its popularity. Pre-FIM, people would have never expected ponies to get popular and the show was expected to be doomed to failure. Basically, they gave a series, which they expected to be nothing but drinking tea and baby shit, a shot and watched it. They realized that they didn't get what they expected - they got a rather decent series. -- 06:20, 18 January 2012 (CET)
No, its got nothing to do with hipsters. I've "met" lots of fellow bronies online, they are all devout to the show not in some faggy ironic way, but in a way that is true and genuine. You have to take into consideration that FIM DESTROYS the stereotype of typical girl's shows, introducing likeable characters and a decent plot. Whether or not someone likes it, however, is totally up to the eye of the beholder. ---- 17:41, 20 January 2012 (EST)  — Preceding comment added by Alanthewhite (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!
Are you actually suggesting that this show has decent plot? Are you fucking autistic???Mike the Great 00:11, 21 January 2012 (CET)

Lawl nigguh, next thing you know this article praises the superior "Plot" of this girls show and autistic furfags all over the place editing their sick rule 34 faggotry into it! --Buttseks 03:22, 21 January 2012 (CET)

Zero to retard in just 3 posts, good job guys. Anyway, unnamed EDiot below Halcy, that is complete shit, and I'll tell you why. MLP is not special. Now that I think about it, it's generic in every sense of the word. The characters are just caricatures of every cartoon stereotype in the book, ("Brash but stubborn one", "shy yet determined one", "smart and unsociable one", etc.) the episodes are lessons I learned from Sesame Street given a 30 minute run time, and the animation has a painfully rushed quality to it. It is a show that deserves a watch, but not a perverted, rabid, aspie fanbase. --RTD 04:01, 21 January 2012 (CET)

My feelings. They are hurt. WELL, TIME TO MASTURBATE TO HORSES! 18:46, 21 January 2012 (EST)  — Preceding comment added by Alanthewhite (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!

Every person I have spoken to who likes My Little Pony is either a furry, an aspie or a stoner. With the former and the latter, the explanation is usually "because it's AWESOME, man", but it seems aspies have no idea why they like it, treating it as a guilty, private pleasure, and going through some kind of self-discovery trip trying to figure out what makes it so appealing.
Myself? I don't know. Sometimes I kid myself into thinking there's nothing wrong with enjoying some sort of innocent fun, but every time I witness part of the show I find myself reeling in agony from the irritating voices, horrible writing and pathetic jokes. I can sympathise with its feminazi creator's cause to create girls' entertainment that doesn't try to shove them all into one "perfect princess" category; hell, it's probably great for that audience, but it's amazing what lengths some ponyfags go to to convince themselves that the show is specifically aimed at them. It also doesn't warrant the way fans and creators alike act as if it's some revolutionary new Winnie The Pooh of children's television; some idol of purity, when basically it was commissioned by a multi-billion dollar toy company to sell plastic shit to little girls using as many references to popular culture as possible. – NuclearDuckie 06:50, 22 January 2012 (CET)

No, it's not even close to the pure orgasmic pleasure that is Winnie the Pooh, nor is it aimed at adults. Yes, it IS made to sell plastic shit. But don't you think labeling bronies as aspies, furfags, or stoners may be a little unfair? That's only, like.... 30% of the population of bronies. The rest are... not aspies/stoners/furfags. Yes, they are strange, odd people, but let's be honest, that's a good description of ANYONE who partakes in 4Chan/ED flamewars/discussions/posts, regardless of whether or not they are bronies. And let's be cereal now; the jokes aren't rage-inducingly bad, the voices aren't ear-rapingly annoying, and the writing isn't so bad that it makes people go all choke-on-my-own-vomit-and-die. Well, actually, that's a matter of opinion, so nevermind. I find that most of the hate of the show doesn't come from My Little Pony itself; rather, it comes from pony boards, pony sites, pony fans, pony discussions, etc etc. In a way, haters have my sympathies. For instance, I can't go five steps on my favorite website without somebody talking about Ron Paul, a candidate of which I disagree strongly. Alanthewhite 01:57, 23 January 2012 (CET)

This page contains spoilers — important plot secrets and/or conclusions may be revealed. For example,
HOLY SHIT ED IS UNFAIR!!!1

Mike the Græt (Talk) 01:59, 23 January 2012 (CET)

  • I have two questions for you Alan.
1. How long have you been on EncyclopediaDramatica?
2. Have you noticed that a few of the guys working on this article watch/are fans of MLP?
oh, and 3. Do you know what the phrase "Get over yourself" means? --RTD 03:06, 23 January 2012 (CET)
Actually, what I said was that everybody I have spoken to who likes the show fits into one of those categories. In each case it has been self-identified and not merely a judgement on my behalf. I don't even dislike the people; what faggotry they choose to participate in is completely up to them, but I can't help seeking to identify what it is that drives so many people in this direction. You are right, though, many of the Brony population are not necessarily any of those types, as I plainly forgot to list those hipster meme kiddies who inhabit cesspits such as the Minecraft Forum and YouTube comment sections, plus the people who have been cast out from social circles and need something to bond over;     not to mention girls … but I don't really count them. Yes, there are many more retards of the same caliber who don't belong to the Brony community; in fact, I could describe most of /co/ as pathetic manchildren (rarely do I see threads devoted to cartoons actually targeted at adults), but why should that vindicate them of anything? And sure, some people like it for legitimate reasons and choose to ignore all the meme bullshit, and that's fine – the show has a right to exist and attract an audience. Though I must say, if you think substituting "-pony" into words containing "-body" at every instance constitutes good humour, you really need to go die in a fire. – NuclearDuckie 14:21, 23 January 2012 (CET)

1.) I've been on ED for a few years, but I haven't even touched the discussion panels at all. I hardly consider myself a veteran, so please excuses me of any faggotry I may spew-out of my cunt-lips. 2.) No I haven't. Damn, I really need to lurk some more. 3.) I'll get right on it, chief! 4.) Is there a way to change my name from "Alanthewhite" to "BronyfagWhoHasAFootUpHisAssAndADickInHisMouth"? Alanthewhite 21:02, 23 January 2012 (CET)

To get back to the original question, Lord Tony, you basically already say the reason why this show is so popular. You went at it objectively, without any bias or maybe even with a bias that the show might be decent and you found out that it was exactly that, but nothing special. However, most people didn't go at it objectively. Before they first watched it, they thought the show was absolute rubbish, completely trite. Then, they found out that it was actually good. This has a much higher impact on anyone, because they didn't expect it. It's like the Spanish Inquisition. Their chief weapon is surprise. Also, at the end of the day, whether you like the show or not is merely a matter of taste. For example, I tried watching some PPG episodes and didn't like them at all. Nixitur 10:46, 26 January 2012 (CET)

Spam Lauren Faust until she quits entirely.

Seems like the only sensible option, right? We need a massive 4chan raid on Lauren Faust. Lord Tony 08:54, 21 January 2012 (CET)

  • Dude, she stopped working on the show MONTHS ago. --RTD 19:19, 21 January 2012 (CET)
No, she still works on the show, as a consulting producer or some shit, IDK. Besides, a 4Chan raid won't stop her from doing her job. Shit, I bet she gets a six-digit salary, too. 18:50, 21 January 2012 (EST)  — Preceding comment added by Alanthewhite (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!
I think it's a shitty idea. The show and MLP won't disappear if she quit, it'd just go back to its worse old self. As much as some people hate the fandom, I don't understand the logic of trying to make something less entertaining so there would be fewer fans of it. Using CareBears as an example: the old cartoons were amazing in plot compared to the 3d shit for babies they spew out today, but if it were revamped into something good, you'd want to see it turned into vomit again? Think of the children! Ty-cmeal 01:11, 22 January 2012 (CET)
  • FFS Alan, she was a consultant for the first few episodes in the second season and then dropped out entirely: http://fyre-flye.deviantart.com/journal/FAQ-276161988. I noticed a dip in quality a little while after she left, but for the most part the show is largely unchanged.

"-the second half I only helped with concepts and attended the story meetings. My part in the show ended in April 2011 and I am no longer involved in the show." --RTD 02:49, 22 January 2012 (CET)

>largely unchanged

So it's still a load of babyfur-attracting bullcrap amirite? --Buttseks 21:30, 22 January 2012 (CET)

Brony Pizza Hunt

I'm sure you'd love to have one more video in your article. It pretty much sums up the brony fandom in 15 minutes. Vaporeon 14:03, 21 January 2012 (CET)

  • I dunno, only two videos seems a bit small to me too. If anything then the whole video section should go into the article again. --Buttseks 21:30, 22 January 2012 (CET)
I'm interested in seeing it before I agree whether or not it should be included. Can you please add the URL to this talk page section? Ty-cmeal 23:55, 22 January 2012 (CET)
I don't like combining all the videos together in a playlist because these ponyfags keep sneaking their shitty unfunny vids into it. So we need to find a way around that. Lord Tony 00:02, 23 January 2012 (CET)
The best way I can see is we do not allow any videos on the article which have not been pre-approved via submission and review on the talk page by trusted ED staff. Read: editors like me. Ty-cmeal 02:01, 23 January 2012 (CET)
Have a URL. You lazy cunt. Also Vaporeon had already added the video before this discussion FYI. – NuclearDuckie 03:02, 24 January 2012 (CET) (Edited 13:57, 24 January 2012 (CET))

Derpy Hooves: From Fanon to Canon

What does everybody think of the new episode with Derpy having a small role with a brand new voice acting? Ivo Robotnik: SnooPING AS usual I see! 02:32, 23 January 2012 (CET)

It makes me glad that I don't watch that shit ♥♥♥ 03:08, 23 January 2012 (CET)
WHO THE FUCK CARES? Go fuck your little ponies on a website that supports your shitty fandom. Lord Tony 11:10, 23 January 2012 (CET)
Wow, you must be really butthurt with sand up your ass over the word pony. I don't even watch the show. I only contribute and deliver latest news as always. Ivo Robotnik: SnooPING AS usual I see! 15:56, 23 January 2012 (CET)
  • Calm down little brony. Get the fuck out of my internets. Lord Tony 00:44, 24 January 2012 (CET)
You asked an arbitrary question pertaining to a fan character that has little to no relevance in the context of this article, completely out of the blue. You'd have to be retarded to not think you're a ponyfag. Also, useless pipes are useless. --RTD 21:57, 23 January 2012 (CET)

Permission to add pipes to the character section?

It looks kind of bland right now and I know Gray's main issue with the piping was that only half of the characters were linked to other articles, so I can do all of them at once if you want. I'd just do it, but I really don't want start another 'tard skirmish in that section. --RTD 13:18, 23 January 2012 (CET)

How about we scrap the main character section and only talk about the main character ponies. Lord Tony 00:46, 24 January 2012 (CET)

That sort of thing might not work for this kind of article given the character driven nature of the show. If anything, we might want to look at how other character sections are made and refine this one. Of course, if that's the direction you want to go in', I'm game. --RTD 01:37, 24 January 2012 (CET)

Piped it. Make changes as you see fit. I like what you guys did to the descriptions, but Applejack (fix'd) and Celestia are still kinda' bad. --RTD 01:07, 25 January 2012 (CET)

We need more gore

The gallery section is really really lacking in terms of disgusting shit that makes you want to vomit. There's GOT to be some pics of mutilated unicorns being penetrated by a 10-inch schlong with Hitler jacking it in his own mouth or something. Alanthewhite 03:06, 24 January 2012 (CET)

As long as it isn't cupcakes related. Bronies seem to get a boner to the cupcakes shit. Lord Tony 06:07, 24 January 2012 (CET)
Yes. We do.Alanthewhite 12:48, 24 January 2012 (CET)

(lawleditconflict)   I haven't seen any guro that isn't fan-art. Same as I haven't seen any gorefics that aren't written by the fans, nor any Rule 34 that Bronies don't all want to jack themselves off to. Nobody who hates the show will bother to spend any amount of time making content for it, no matter how spiteful, and even if they did the fans would just lap it up as they do any content related to their precious ponies. These are people who are mostly either sick fucks themselves, or have seen it all before and pride themselves on their troll-resistance.
If you're just looking for something to suit the tone of the article though, here's one I recall seeing. I had to fish through the fetid archive of /co/'s general threads in order to find it. You're welcome. – NuclearDuckie 13:47, 24 January 2012 (CET)

We don't need a bunch of stupid shit just to "offend" them. The issue with pages like this, as well as Furfag, liberal, etc is that you faggots are trying too hard to attack a vulnerable group, when only about 15% will find it offensive anyway. ♥♥♥ 14:16, 24 January 2012 (CET)
We don't necessarily need to offend anyone. Just some gore to shock people, be the victim brony or no. Alanthewhite 21:00, 24 January 2012 (CET)
  • I've drawn ponies taking ordinance through the face, does that count NukeDuck? Anyway, I think Alan's right, a few more mutilation pics won't hurt. --RTD 00:26, 25 January 2012 (CET)
Some brony sick fuck named Zookuw sent me this so I put it in. I'm not sure if cartoons fall under CP though and if it does just remove it. Lord Tony 03:41, 25 January 2012 (CET)
  • Don't worry. if Loli and Shota fell under CP, half of ED would be blanked right now. --RTD 03:50, 25 January 2012 (CET)
  • Am I able to put that picture in the picture of the now? Lord Tony 09:43, 25 January 2012 (CET)
  • I was going to ponder whether any of CrookedTrees's stuff was gore, but it looks like his Tumblr got baleeted. Good riddance.   >.>               That said, sure, I agree we need something a bit harsher than that PonyGoggles pic linked to by the main paragraph. But like I said earlier, all of it is drawn by the fans. Most of them seem to be more about making a character or scene seem "OOH CREEPY!" than indulging in "proper" violence. Or maybe I'm just not looking hard enough. – NuclearDuckie 12:15, 25 January 2012 (CET)

If you spot a brony do this.

WARNING:

This user is a brony and should be sold to your nearest glue factory immediately.

Add this to the user page of the person you suspect is a brony. Lord Tony 09:46, 25 January 2012 (CET)

K. Alanthewhite 13:48, 25 January 2012 (CET)

Anybody Agree?

Thinking of putting the externals links to youtube in the video collage. All in favor sign here Mike the Græt (Talk) 01:51, 26 January 2012 (CET) FUCK YOU ALL I DO WHAT I WANT. One of the videos sucked, and the other one definately doesn't need to be an external link so long as we have a gallery for it. Mike the Græt (Talk) 02:22, 26 January 2012 (CET)

Article locked again.

Why? Lord Tony 04:26, 26 January 2012 (CET)

Because you have a psychosexual trauma with this article, less is more.   Snape    talk    contribs   04:31, 26 January 2012 (CET)
Unlocked.   Snape    talk    contribs   04:31, 26 January 2012 (CET)
Can we delete it plox? ~Oblique 04:32, 26 January 2012 (CET)
  • Do you have some internet issue with ponies? You should quit taking this so srys. Nobody gives a fuck about the images. About 60% of them are abso-fucking-lutely retarded, and the other 40% are gay. Honestly, if both all three galleries were deleted entirely, the page would be better. Also since Lord Tony is too fucking retarded and/or on some sort of reversion spree to actually look to my changes and notice the misplaced markups I also corrected, somebody should go back and fix the stray marks they reverted. I don't care enough to do it again. ED is the place to document drama, not stir it up between users who are helping. Mike the Græt (Talk) 04:44, 26 January 2012 (CET)
Leave it unlocked and revert faggots when needed. Also, we don't need a whole fucking gallery of MLP porn, maybe one or two images (if you clopping faggots find it absolutely necessary). ♥♥♥ 04:55, 26 January 2012 (CET)
I only undone one thing, why is everyone acting like I went into a full blown edit war? Well if it matters I undone what I just undone. Lord Tony 07:50, 26 January 2012 (CET)
You actually undo every fucking shit here.   Snape    talk    contribs   17:09, 26 January 2012 (CET)

FUCKING PURGE EVERYTHING

I am agree with oblique, lets start from zero this article.   Snape    talk    contribs   05:00, 26 January 2012 (CET)

  • ^ ◔ᴗ◔ 05:01, 26 January 2012 (CET)
We need a page, but we need a good page. Not some chantard shit, but a brief write up on this shit and then link to relevant pages (ie, sethisto, pickbothmanlol) ♥♥♥ 05:09, 26 January 2012 (CET)
  • I would be more than happy to re-write it, but I don't watch the show. I know nothing. In any case, why not lock it until somebody agrees to the task, and then move it from a sandbox here instead of just not having a page for a while. Is a terrible article written by 14-year-olds better than no article at all? Regardless I third fourth Oblique. Mike the Græt (Talk) 05:26, 26 January 2012 (CET)
  • I'll pitch in when I have the time. -- 07:52, 26 January 2012 (CET)
  • Seems like a waste, but I know enough about the whole thing to assist Halcy if you decide to start from scratch. Personally though, I don't think this is a bad article. The "disease" section is accurate and humorous, the and the concept section is pretty good. The only things wrong with the article in my opinion is the over-saturation of pictures and 34. Also, if were gonna rewrite this shit, we need more than two people who know about the show. Many of you are good contributors, but you barely know anything about the content we're writing. Put on your big boy pants, pop some popcorn, find the full episodes on Youtube or On-Demand, and watch this shit 'till your eyes vomit rainbows. --RTD 13:20, 26 January 2012 (CET)
  • I know more about MLP than a nigger knows about chicken and hip hop. I can help with the article, but I'm sure that there are better, funnier writers than me to do it. So are we just gonna edit straight from the current article or wait for it to be deleted? Also, I think this is the longest discussion page I've seen on a single article. We should be proud of ourselves. Alanthewhite 16:43, 26 January 2012 (CET)
  • >Put on your big boy pants, pop some popcorn, find the full episodes on Youtube or On-Demand, and watch this shit 'till your eyes vomit rainbows.
    That sounds enabling as fuck, and I'm sure it's exactly the kind of mentality that drives the people who obsess over this shit. In any case though, I have already seen the first season, and there isn't a lot to say about it. But I could probably write something decent about the general fandom if I took the time to articulate my thoughts about it. – NuclearDuckie 01:50, 28 January 2012 (CET)

No, the mind set that drives those assholes is: "ZOMG MLP iz dah' best cart00n evar maed an you shud' watch eet cuz u'll prolly' turn into a huge fag0t liek me!" I'm not sure if you've noticed ND, but the authors of some of the best articles on the site (especially the furry and TV/Movie articles) were pretty well informed about the subject they were writing on. It lets you tailor the article to be more in-depth AND humorous, instead of just blindly editing shit because saying the word 'faggot' eleven times makes stuff funny. Whether you find enjoyment in the show or not is irrelevant, I just don't want all of our work being dragged though the mud. A few episodes and a rudimentary knowledge of the fandom is more than enough. --RTD 13:31, 28 January 2012 (CET)

Oh I understand that to write a decent article on this kind of topic, one has to dip into the deep end a little. Just the way I read that prompt it sounded like it could be the beginning of a slippery slope – I know I for one once took up browsing the 4chan threads out of curiosity, which then became a habit that used most of my free time, despite how I told myself I wasn't like the people posting. They were the obsessed ones.
Super cereal personal issues aside, I do see the Furry article as an apex of ED writing, even if MSheep doesn't seem to think so. Certainly something worth aiming for with this. – NuclearDuckie 00:44, 30 January 2012 (CET)
Don't listen to him. You were 100% right. Any article requires knowledge of the subject, even on ED. He's just trolling. In fact, if there actually were bronies with a strong sense of humor, they would be ideal for writing it. Unfortunately part of the fandom requires you liking horsecock so much you never say anything bad about MLP ever and they seem to be too fucking dense to get that this site is satirical and meant to make everything look fucking terrible. Mike the Græt (Talk) 00:56, 30 January 2012 (CET)
Quoting something I already said here


   
“ 		 
most of the people who wrote the My Little Pony article are just bronies trolling bronies. Bronies who happen to be hardened ED veterans, That's just how ED works. Not necessarily faggots. You see, unlike furfags, you're not automatically a faggot for liking MLP, there's just massive faggotry surrounding it; great show, godawful nazi-tier fanbase.
  		„
  		 

--RapeMan 01:00, 30 January 2012 (CET)

THis was shat out on my user page by somebody too fucking retarded to put shit where it's relevant. This guy's a huge ponyfucker and is doing anything he can to spread the fandom. He also seems to miss that "Most the people who wrote" the article are RTDice and LordTony. Mike the Græt (Talk) 01:05, 30 January 2012 (CET)

So the infection spreads...

Every site,Every video site,every torrent site,every thing on the internet has ponies. God damn,Why don't they just keep their shit to themselves,Not spam everywhere and shoving shit in non ponyfags faces?

--ChaosSoldier1 10:31, 27 January 2012 (CET)ChaosSoldier1

You must be new here. Alanthewhite 02:11, 28 January 2012 (CET)
Because they are basically furfags. They want to shove their pony shit in everyone's face and then they wonder why people hate them. Lord Tony 03:01, 28 January 2012 (CET)
I'm not really new here,I'm just saying they have already infected every site that is available.
--ChaosSoldier1 05:33, 28 January 2012 (CET)ChaosSoldier1
Go on deviant art. You can literally search anything and there will ALWAYS be a pony version of it. Pony trains, pony cars, pony cake, pony highlander, etc. Lord Tony 08:16, 28 January 2012 (CET)
You must be really REALLY new here if you're still talking about that. Alanthewhite 01:41, 29 January 2012 (CET)
When I search Mike The User I get some guy who uploads pony shit to some website. Does anyone know if this person is related to the Mike here? Lord Tony 13:53, 29 January 2012 (CET)
According to him he's never even watched the show, and honestly Tony, does it matter? --RTD 18:53, 29 January 2012 (CET)

Can someone raid these fags already?

I have been trolling the broneis for a while (i have nothing to do for a long time) Noone wants to help me. If people hate the ponyfags, than where are all the trolls damn it!?


pic related.


Make this article the best you fucking can. becuase bronies are the worst fucking thing to ever happen, leaking into real life, and other countries!

WHAT HAS HAPPEND TO MY COUNTRY?

Load video
YouTube


KILL PONYFAG ZOOPHILES! 19:25, 29 January 2012 (CET)

  • Lets start with ED is not your personal army followed by you getting off your sorry chantard ass and helping improve the article yourself, sound good? ◔ᴗ◔ 19:29, 29 January 2012 (CET)

Holy fuck, the amount of virgins in that video is amazing! Lord Tony 19:35, 29 January 2012 (CET)

Aren't some of the writers of this article bronies themselves? Alanthewhite 22:54, 29 January 2012 (CET)


First of all, Encyclopedia Dramatica is not the place to be organizing raids, it's also pretty impossible by now to 'raid' something that's migrated across the entire web and back, and therefore not contained within any raid-able radius. And another thing, most of the people who wrote the My Little Pony article are just bronies trolling bronies. Bronies who happen to be hardened ED veterans, That's just how ED works. Not necessarily faggots. You see, unlike furfags, you're not automatically a faggot for liking MLP [citation needed], there's just massive faggotry surrounding it; great show [citation needed], godawful nazi-tier fanbase.

--RapeMan 00:55, 30 January 2012 (CET)

   
“ 		 
You see, unlike furfags, you're not automatically a faggot for liking MLP,
  		„
  		 

—RapeMan, in denial about his furrydom

Remember, kids, don't trust a pony about what a pony is.Mike the Græt (Talk) 01:37, 30 January 2012 (CET)

Sometimes, I wonder about this whole discussion. Some of you faggots are taking My Little Pony more seriously than the fucking fanbase does. For God's sake, hate on the show or be a brony, just don't bring your "OLOLOLOLOLOL RAIDZING THE BRONYIEZ" faggotry here. The whole purpose of this article is to document the drama surrounding MLP in a humorous way, and trying to get ED as your personal army isn't going to help. Alanthewhite 02:33, 30 January 2012 (CET)

Well, to make it not suck, dont talk about any of the characters. bronies like that shit. thats all i got. not a good writer. OH OH! I GOT IT! make it look like they only like Gen 1. KILL PONYFAG ZOOPHILES! 05:16, 30 January 2012 (CET)

Rapeman hit the nail on the head. Also It doesn't matter what the Bronies like or don't like. As Alan said, ED articles are about documentation AND lulz. --RTD 05:24, 30 January 2012 (CET)

Rapeman is a ponyfag. all is lost. KILL PONYFAG ZOOPHILES! 06:27, 30 January 2012 (CET)

See, arguments like this never go anywhere, not because they are pointless and we should "all be friends", but because both sides are too retarded to lay down any solid points without slipping up in their own shit. – NuclearDuckie 07:13, 30 January 2012 (CET)

No, people always talk about logic, and getting there point across through peaceful logic. But i have seen these peaceful logical conversations, and its just people saying "I DISSAGREE WITH YOUR OPINION, BUT I RESPECT IT" and the other person "AWW ME AS WELL HUGS" nothing gets solved. its just “LEAVE THEM ALONE, TOLERANCE!1“ that shit never got anyone anywhere! VIOLENCE DID. colonisation did. KILL PONYFAG ZOOPHILES! 09:05, 30 January 2012 (CET)

I disagree with your opinion, but I respect it. – NuclearDuckie 10:03, 30 January 2012 (CET)
Respect never stopped muslims from female circumcision-ing females, or black genocide in Libya. KILL PONYFAG ZOOPHILES! 10:54, 30 January 2012 (CET)

I still don't see why there's so much butthurt edit waring over this page/talk page. All you faggots do is reiterate the same shit day after day.

 
“ 		 
Troll: lololol fuck bronies, needs moar gore

Brony: lolol u mad?????? just stfu nigger

Closet Brony: It's not such a bad show you know!!!11!1
 

„
 

—This page in a nutshell

♥♥♥ 13:58, 30 January 2012 (CET)

I'm perfectly fine with calling bronies ZOOPHILIA MANIACS etc. for trolling purposes, this is ED afterall. But I can't help but feel that this article is being used mainly by /b/tards for venting their retarded opinions, and not for fabricating over the top bullshit intended for lulz. Whatever the case, this article and users in the discussion page are taking things too seriously. I've been on thousands of ED pages, scrolled slowly all the way through the Offended page with a straight face, and I just so happen to be a Brony. So stop getting anally devastated over what other EDiots like and let's just work on pulling this article together instead.

--RapeMan 03:40, 1 February 2012 (CET)

  • ED's lulz comes from fabricating over-the-top bullshit now? Are you sure you're not thinking of another humourous comedy website? – NuclearDuckie 10:35, 1 February 2012 (CET)
  • Then quit removing perfectly humorous content. If you have such a problem with this page edit another one, or completely rewrite this one somewhere else and port it over when it's approved of. Removing things one at a time because they make you look bad isn't productive at all, and makes you look like a total dick who doesn't respect his co-writers. Mike the Græt (Talk) 00:46, 3 February 2012 (EST)
  • Ignore Rapeman he is just a brony, any edit he makes just revert it because he will probably try to sneak pony shit one way or another.Lord Tony 01:50, 3 February 2012 (EST)
  • Pssh, what? MLP has done nothing but ruin shit for me; I have no reason to like it. – NuclearDuckie 06:46, 5 February 2012 (EST)

The thing with bronies is.

I rather be a furfag than become a ponyfag. I fucking hate furries but at least furfaggotry is less than ponyfaggotry. Lord Tony 13:15, 30 January 2012 (CET)

That's not really "the thing" with Bronies; it's just one of your many things with them. Which we are all familiar with by now—you don't need to create a new section for every thought that enters your head. – NuclearDuckie 16:55, 30 January 2012 (CET)

Wat Do?

This talk page is getting repetitive. So in the interest of switching to a less retarded subject, what exactly needs changing in the article? It says we need a serious clean-up, but I don't see anything inherently wrong with the article, save for the aforementioned over saturation of pictures in the middle of the page. How's about we log all of our complaints here and set to work fixing them? Sound like a plan? --RTD 15:12, 30 January 2012 (CET)

Here's a complaint: LordTony keeps reverting fucking everything. Also, he won't stfu about his hatred for mlp. I don't think he even contributes to the article, he just bitches and bitches. Alanthewhite 16:18, 30 January 2012 (CET)
This section was made to log complaints regarding the ARTICLE, but what the hell, I'll weigh in. In all fairness, Tony has probably contributed the most to this article, so I can understand his apprehension regarding new edits. That said, articles should be communal, not dictatorial. Try to lay off the reverts LT, it's a little pretentious. --RTD 18:05, 30 January 2012 (CET)
I already decided to stop editing for awhile. Alan do you have a problem with me and my hatred for ponyfags? Lord Tony 00:22, 31 January 2012 (CET)
Nigger, I don't give a shit if you fantasize about fucking my mom and raping my dog, I honestly couldn't care less about your opinions. But you constantly spew forth your faggotry every time a new MLP insult comes to mind. It's all "OLOLOLOLOL MLP IS GAY" this "OLOLOLOL I HATE PONYFAGS" that. Actually, I wouldn't even mind your bitching if you just stopped being such a fag about all this and let people make changes to the damn article without you reverting everything. Alanthewhite 01:52, 31 January 2012 (CET)
This is goddamn ridiculous. Tony hasn't made an edit in days, Alan. Seriously, if you're going to keep this up, please use his user-talk. This entire discussion page is turning into one huge in-fight. --RTD 02:31, 31 January 2012 (CET)
Fine, I won't mention it again for the sake of trying to preserve any coherent thoughts on this page. Alanthewhite 02:56, 31 January 2012 (CET)

Trolling Bronies

After making a few edits on the article, I noticed that the section on "trolling bronies" has been deleted, or something. Bear with me, I'm still relatively new to the whole editing bullshit, but can someone explain to me why it was deleted? I for one thought that the section was pretty funny, and didn't see anything wrong with it. Alanthewhite 03:19, 31 January 2012 (CET)

Because it sucks and no one cares. Meepsheep made that clear. Lord Tony 08:10, 31 January 2012 (CET)
I removed the section because it, like most of the page, was written by 12-year-old channers who think they're edgy for wrtting "shit" and "fuck" on the internet. ♥♥♥ 02:11, 1 February 2012 (CET)

February

ok

When half the fucking article is templates and banners and signs telling people not to edit the fucking article, that is fucking retarded. Yeah we get it, you don't like MLP. Get the fuck over it and let people edit or I will rewrite it myself to be so pro-fucking-friendship that you will be shitting marshmallows and pissing rainbows after you read it. --zaiger (talk) 02:27, 3 February 2012 (EST)

I already piss rainbows. ~Oblique 03:14, 3 February 2012 (EST)
Whoa-ho-ho This article is suddenly 20% less shitty. --RTD 15:38, 3 February 2012 (EST)
Closet brony, much? Alanthewhite 20:31, 3 February 2012 (EST)
You do not piss off Zaiger. You should know this if you were here before the ED merge. Lord Tony 05:51, 5 February 2012 (EST)
I wasn't talking to Zaiger. He frightens me. Alanthewhite 10:56, 5 February 2012 (EST)
Oh wow, broken syntaxes. You know what. I'm going to reconstruct this damn article. My grammar is going to be shitty, so fix it for me. -- 14:28, 11 February 2012 (EST)

Where should this video go?

It's a satirical video regarding the type of faggots who are into this shit.JohnathanNiggers 03:33, 8 February 2012 (EST)

Load video
YouTube
It doesn't look like much effort was actually put into it. Lord Tony 19:18, 11 February 2012 (EST)

Spamming comments with fruit salad?

http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/241193-my-little-pony-friendship-is-magic#comments A comment said:


   
“ 		 
The fruit salad thing was created as an anti-trolling device, and has been used extensively for that purpose. It’s a fun, lulzy way to silence a troll without letting them feel like they’ve won, and to negate situations which may cause a rage war.
  		„
  		 

—'Ephemeral_Athambia-

|}

wtf KILL PONYFAG ZOOPHILES! 01:28, 10 February 2012 (EST)

Sounds like a suitably obnoxious way for them to respond to legitimate arguments trolling. I'm so far beyond my capacity to care at this point, however … though I do find it funny that all the pictures are watermarked. – NuclearDuckie 05:21, 12 February 2012 (EST)

Ponyfags are sick fucks

Load video
YouTube

What did you guys expect to happen? JohnathanNiggers 03:32, 14 February 2012 (EST)

Fucking sick furfags. Lord Tony 13:57, 14 February 2012 (EST)
I can feel a small tumor growing in the back of my eyes. --RTD 20:04, 14 February 2012 (EST)
There are sicker things. I can't think of any right now, but I'm sure that there are sicker things. Alanthewhite 22:34, 14 February 2012 (EST)
Oh, and someone should make this the video of the now before it gets deleted from Youtube. Alanthewhite 22:40, 14 February 2012 (EST)

Yeah I tried. But the queue was a little too long and it didn't last the night through. Wouldn't be surprised if someone re-uploads it somewhere as incriminating evidence though. – NuclearDuckie 05:51, 15 February 2012 (EST)

lol it took 5 days to remove the vid. Someone posts a kids dry humping and it's down in 5 minutes. Lord Tony 10:12, 15 February 2012 (EST)
  • Fucking hell. Making a series, is he? – NuclearDuckie 22:03, 15 February 2012 (EST)
Why would somebody fap to pony figurines!? Why would they make three videos of it!? Why would they post it on the internet!? WHY DID I WATCH ALL THREE OF THEM!?!?!? Alanthewhite 19:21, 16 February 2012 (EST)
Furfags do this all the time. Ponyfags are furfags. Lord Tony 00:10, 17 February 2012 (EST)

Aw Shit

http://boards.4chan.org/mlp/ http://boards.4chan.org/mlp/ http://boards.4chan.org/mlp/ http://boards.4chan.org/mlp/ Hot diggity damn, nigga. Shit's about to go down in 4Chan. Alanthewhite 18:37, 17 February 2012 (EST)

  • inb4-- damn. --RTD 02:58, 18 February 2012 (EST)
  • Fucking FINALLY. Woulda been funny to see them shoved in with /vp/ though. Oh well, compromises … – NuclearDuckie 06:51, 18 February 2012 (EST)

I don't even know what da fuq is going on. Is moot having his period again? Is it just one giant honey pot? So many questions mah niggas... --Buttseks 10:16, 18 February 2012 (EST)

  • I'm hoping moot turns /mlp/ into 4chan's ban gulag. Just ban people into only being able to access that, and the pedo singularity on /b/ would collapse onto itself. --Enig of Norway - Talk Haus 11:55, 18 February 2012 (EST)
If it's not a trap oh well, 4chan has always been shit but MLP will make it worse. Lord Tony 12:07, 18 February 2012 (EST)

6,000+ images of sick fuckery.

http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/MLP/1

Shitloads of disgusting rule 34 images in there. Let me know if you find anything truly disgusting so we can put it in the article. Lord Tony 11:01, 19 February 2012 (EST)

  • I think just about everyone here realizes that you can find Rule 34 of My Little Pony by going on Paheal. Really, we have enough porn.Alanthewhite 16:40, 19 February 2012 (EST)
  • I don't think we need anymore gallery padding, unless we swap out some of the existing pics.--RTD 19:08, 19 February 2012 (EST)
  • Check the history, each new picture I put in I took out an existing one. You guys did say you needed more "guro" right? Lord Tony 21:00, 19 February 2012 (EST)

Goddammit, y'all

It's been days since moot created the /mlp/ board. WHY THE HELL IS THERE BARELY ANY COVERAGE OF THIS ON THE ARTICLE?? This is perhaps the biggest event in the My Little Pony drama, and we ain't got shit on it. Alanthewhite 18:01, 20 February 2012 (EST)'

The article is about the show. That's probably why. Half the shit on it shouldn't be on here. If this article weren't such a clusterfuck of edit wars, it would have been featured 4 times over, and people would actually enjoy editing it. /mlp/ is probably going to need its own article before long, or at least go on the 4chan one. Are you volunteering? Mike the Græt (Talk) 18:19, 20 February 2012 (EST)
I'd go and study /mlherpes/, but they don't make an HEV suit strong enough to withstand that much idiocy. --Enig of Norway - Talk Haus 18:36, 20 February 2012 (EST)
The article doesn't really focus on the show that much, only the top 30% or so. Either way it's much ado about nothing. Just a bunch of hipster faggots posting about a kid's cartoon. No drama (yet.), not much trolling (yet), no bannings (yet). Until it gets interesting, all we can do is watch this tumor grow. --RTD 19:40, 20 February 2012 (EST)

Chris-chan.

A video was leaked yesterday of him humping a sex doll while yelling "who's your brony?" The first legit way to piss off a ponyfag or no? --Enig of Norway - Talk Haus 10:00, 26 February 2012 (EST)

link plz ♥♥♥ 11:45, 26 February 2012 (EST)
giyf – NuclearDuckie 19:00, 26 February 2012 (EST)
I fucking love this. The bronies are freaking out and now they are trying to convince others that not all bronies are like this. Fucking hilarious, it makes me want to say dick for no apparent reason. Dick dick dick dick dick dick dick dick dick dick DICK! Lord Tony 21:38, 26 February 2012 (EST)
"Not all bronies are like this" my ass. They're all nothing but a bunch of autismal fucks fantasasing about fucking ponies --BronxBoyfromBronx 08:54, 27 February 2012 (EST)

>Wake up >Eat breakfast >Hmmmm I wonder what ED is doing >See a video of Chris-Chan being a faggot >What a great way to start-off the day! Alanthewhite 17:14, 27 February 2012 (EST)

New Section: "Famous" bronies

Did you know that Chris Chan is a hipster brony. --BronxBoyfromBronx 09:01, 27 February 2012 (EST)

Redditfag Brony is Forever Alone (nothing unusual)

Someone send that fag a link to Chris-chan's vid, stat. --Enig of Norway - Talk Haus 18:40, 27 February 2012 (EST)
I'm really getting sick of this shitty fanbase. Bronies are making furries look good. Lord Tony 21:29, 27 February 2012 (EST)
This is more like obsessive weeaboo/otaku behaviour really. They really are like a combination of every other clutch of horrible people infesting the internet. – NuclearDuckie 07:31, 28 February 2012 (EST)

Does the fact that the picture was tl;dr for me a bad thing? Alanthewhite 15:04, 28 February 2012 (EST)

Yamino killed Derpy Hooves

I started a very bare-bones stub. Someone please help with it. Yamino. --zaiger (talk) 15:38, 29 February 2012 (EST)

Sorry I guess I started this one post-maturely. I have redirected it to the Derpy section of the mail article for the time being. I don't even know who these people are half the time (like in this case), I just like to expedite articles when I see delicious e-drama and throw it out to the editors to work with. Sometimes it turns into something good, sometimes it doesn't. Either way I would rather have one good article come out of 1000 shitty stubs than no good articles coming out of no shitty stubs. --zaiger (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2012 (EST)

March

Bronies

I think we should create a separate Brony article. We can move all the Brony shit to that article and have this one just about MLP, the characters, episodes etc and drama surrounding that. Does anyone want to volunteer to do this? --zaiger (talk) 00:52, 1 March 2012 (EST)

That's a bad idea because, no one gives a shit about My Little Pony the show itself on ED. The My Little Pony article will end up looking like an attempt to encourage other people to watch the show. I mean what exactly are we going to write about in the My Little Pony show article? "Here is all the fucking pony characters and what they do and that's why the show sucks and ponies are gay!"
 
“ 		 
The reason why the article doesn't have much about the actual show because there is nothing to actually discuss. It's just a normal show that somehow managed to get a bunch of perverted in denial furfags coming out of the woodwork. Lord Tony 14:26, 5 January 2012 (CET)
  		„
 

Lord Tony 03:20, 1 March 2012 (EST)

Just have this page describing it as a "forced meme that got way out of hand", and then if you have to have a Brony article, make it more like a list, with links to ones notable enough to get their own pages. At the moment though there only seem to be two or three of them with specific articles. – NuclearDuckie 07:41, 1 March 2012 (EST)
I think it's fine the way it is currently. The bronies are the drama, not the show. If we write about the show we will just end up talking about episodes and characters. The only people that will be able to write the article are fucking bronies that actually watch the show (bronies trolling bronies). Is that what we want? Lord Tony 15:54, 1 March 2012 (EST)
What's wrong with bronies trolling bronies? A few guys who regularly watch the show and write an ED article about it could make this page a whole lot better if you give them a chance. A troll is a troll, no matter how much he watches the pony ass. Alanthewhite 21:03, 1 March 2012 (EST)
  • Because bronies trolling bronies should be left for fucking ponybooru and youtube. It's bad enough we have some faggot bronies using ED as an image uploading service. Now we will have even more pony shit if this happens. Lord Tony 22:07, 1 March 2012 (EST)
I agree with Lord Tony on this. The show just isn't very lulzy without the brony drama that surrounds it. I doubt the show would even have an article on ED without them.  — Preceding comment added by BakaRed (talk • contribs), who is too much of a fucking retard to sign their own posts. IT'S FOUR TILDES (~~~~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!

Tony, bronies that browse ED, who come on this website everyday, who raged when Sherrod pulled the plug on the original site, who donated money to the site whenever they were asked without question, who contribute to articles everyday, are not going to ruin an article just because they like MLP. They want to see this article grow into something great, and will not hesitate to bash the show they have grown to love solely for the well-being of ED. The only "pony shit" that could come of this is pictures of actual pony shit added to the MLP gallery. Alanthewhite 22:24, 1 March 2012 (EST)

Bronies are still nothing but furfaggotry and they are worse than furries. I remember a time where ED did not tolerate furfaggotry or any other form of furfaggotry. Lord Tony 22:37, 1 March 2012 (EST)
you are mistaken sir. ED has always tolerated furries and had a special welcome template for them. -hipcrime 22:38, 1 March 2012 (EST)
I'm sure if a furfag stepped out of line ED took action immediately. Lord Tony 22:40, 1 March 2012 (EST)
it more or less said "it appears you are a furry. as part of the internet we must tolerate you but dont edit war on fur articles or step out of line". -hipcrime 22:42, 1 March 2012 (EST)
What about the one telling people to spam their talk page to let them know they are a furfag? Lord Tony 23:07, 1 March 2012 (EST)
i dunno lol. point is, furries are part of the internet. trying to restrain them is a losing battle. -hipcrime 23:09, 1 March 2012 (EST)
If anybody steps out of line they are banned with extreme prejudice. However the only thing that is really fundamentally against the rules is vandalism in various forms. Any positive contribution is allowed by any user. If somebody edits something and makes it genuinely unfunny, then a reversion is considered a positive edit. Admins are here to be sort of tie breakers, but overall anybody can make do or edit other's work whenever they want. The point being: If a furry came here to ED and brings hilarious drama to document then sure they'd be allowed on. Several of our staff members are furries. Mike the Græt (Talk) 23:13, 1 March 2012 (EST)
There is still nothing to write about with the show in general. I haven't seen many articles of shows that got furries horny as fuck. Lord Tony 01:48, 2 March 2012 (EST)
Sonic Digimon Mike the Græt (Talk) 01:49, 2 March 2012 (EST)
Sonic and Digimon were ripe with faggotry to begin with like Naruto. Lord Tony 01:50, 2 March 2012 (EST)
The Lion King Mike the Græt (Talk) 01:52, 2 March 2012 (EST)

The lion king article doesn't look very funny and is the movie itself even drama worthy? It seriously looks like an uncyclopedia article, lol. Lord Tony 01:57, 2 March 2012 (EST)

We have a user on the job beautifying it currently. Mike the Græt (Talk) 01:59, 2 March 2012 (EST)
Well this "furry" is taking his long damn ass time to make an article look funny that is suppose to make fun of furries. Lord Tony 02:01, 2 March 2012 (EST)
CALM DOWN, FAGGOT.
Nobody is interested in your nerd rage.


Mike the Græt (Talk) 02:04, 2 March 2012 (EST)

  • I see no rage here. Lord Tony 02:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)

Oh for fuck's sake, just drop it. You don't have to drag out every disagreement into a wall of shit text like this. I actually do agree with you, on the grounds that ED is for documenting drama, not attempting (and by all odds, failing) to start it.
Indeed, writing up a "troll" article would just be silly, unless it built up to make some actual point, and having an article that gave information about the show in general would just … like … no-one cares? I have a similar opinion on a lot of the anime articles here that give overly detailed plot outlines and character descriptions while trying to keep them lulzy by saying "faggot" every so often, but usually those at least have relevant drama to go with them. If you're going to make a MLP article internets-relevant without insulting the fans, bascially the only thing you can do is plaster it with memes and in-references, something which ED seems to be inherently against anyway. – NuclearDuckie 08:00, 2 March 2012 (EST)

Maybe we should just rename the article from "My Little Pony" to something like "My Little Pony and Bronies" or just "Bronies" or "My Little Pony and the Faggotry That Ruined the Internet, Killed 4Chan, and Bred a New Generation of Faggots". But seriously, adding something Brony related to the name could quell some arguments here in my opinion. Also, if people are so concerned about the page becoming too pro-pony, we should allow more brony ED-users to work on the article. That way, we'll have an article that actually knows what the fuck it's talking about in terms of the show, and we can get more lulzy in-the-know info about "famous" bronies like that faggot Seth. Alanthewhite 18:27, 2 March 2012 (EST)

Aside from systematically destroying or vandalizing the fandom's infrastructure (EqDaily, Ponychan, and FIM Fiction) I think we'll be hard pressed to dig up much that's more lulzy than what's already available. I've got my fingers crossed that Moot bans every fucker in /mlp/ come April 1st because it will cause a gold mine of lulz. BakaRed 19:58, 2 March 2012 (EST)

Yamino

Hay guys. I've been looking into Yamino. And yes, we can all agree that the bronys are faggots. But this Yamino chick seems as if she has great potential for becoming a lolcow herself. The fact that she took it a upon herself to protect autistic and retards everywhere from the "Neuro-Typicals" (no seriously, she constantly uses this as well as the abbreviation NT quite often) over some background character in a faggy cartoon, puts her right up there in the ranks of stupid soccer moms that feel that their children need to be protected at all costs.

Here are a few golden quotes from her TL;DR post ranting about some kind of MLP game she is working on with a team, and is getting butthurt over the fact that they wish to include derpy. [1]

   
“ 		 
Contrary to what some people here seem to have assumed, I have no problem with having disabled characters get some visibility. I have been campaigning, in this game, and all my other projects, to get more positive representation of many minorities, including the non-neurotypical.
  		„
  		 

—In translation. If it ain't positive, you ain't showing it. Also, if she finds a character that is depicted with a physical disposition, a muffled voice or abnormal behavior as offensive. Then how the hell are you meant to depict the disabled?

   
“ 		 
Propagating ableist stereotypes even on a small scale adds to large scale oppression. I don’t believe that a thousand ignorant people’s right to have a cheap joke is more important than one person’s right to their dignity and respect.
  		„
  		 

—she doesn't seem to understand that respect has to be earned. it doesn't just magically get given to you just because your retarded.

   
“ 		 
Intent doesn’t mean anything. Even if you have no idea how hurtful you are being, the damage is done.
  		„
  		 

—I don't think the legal system would agree. It certainly seems to make or break a case between murder and involuntary manslaughter.

   
“ 		 
Once you understand it is a loaded word, you have two options: become a more educated and sensitive individual, or choose to stay ignorant and continue using oppressive language because it is the easy, selfish, and cowardly thing to do.
  		„
  		 

—Note the stench of USI, and how she thinks that being sensitive to other people is a measure of intelligence.

   
“ 		 
As for myself, I am not a paragon of Social Justice. I have made these mistakes too, and had to be corrected and educated about them. I know it’s embarrassing. I know I will make similar mistakes in the future, and I would hope people would speak up about it so that I could learn and become a better person for it.
  		„
  		 

—This whole part just reads as if it is straight from the teachings of a religious correction facility

Previous Quote | Next Quote


--Pseudonymity0000 17:17, 3 March 2012 (EST)

Yeah, I've skimmed over her blog a few times. That and her DA page are brimming with her sense of moral superiority and shipping fanart of Adventure Time and Avatar:TLAB. There was mention of this one blog post where she goes on at length about how stuff like Derpy gives her flash backs to her brother being abused or some shit.(apparently he's retarded I guess) Frankly she's not worth it though, her ego's been so inflated by all the white knight fucks that flock to her that I say let her stew in her own stupidity. If nothing else she'll keep some drama going on in the brony community for awhile that's bound to yield some good material. BakaRed 17:44, 3 March 2012 (EST)

___

Hmm. Well, I guess that if Yamino did get her own page, it would just be another case of an attention whore getting attention. We will just have to see how things develop. Hopefully her ego will become so inflated through all the attention that this fiasco has generated, that we may get something lulz worthy to start up her own page. But for now I think you're right. She's not really worth the effort at this time.

--Pseudonymity0000 18:02, 3 March 2012 (EST)

Yeah that's the reason why I redirected her article to this page in the first place. Within a day of it going up she had already posted a HEY LOOK I HAVE AN ED ARTICLE AREN'T I COOL GUYS post on DA.--zaiger (talk) 18:04, 3 March 2012 (EST)

Yeah so...

While you guys were busy crying, I split it up myself. Do you think maybe you guys could finish it? --zaiger (talk) 18:21, 3 March 2012 (EST)

ASAP. Mike the Great (talk) 18:24, 3 March 2012 (EST)

Thy will be done. --RTD 19:03, 5 March 2012 (EST)

This article is starting to look like something from uncyclopedia. Lord Tony 22:58, 10 March 2012 (EST)
how do you mean? Elvis 23:50, 10 March 2012 (EST)
The shitty sense of humor, the crappy tags (I found an over 9,000 joke), the way they describe the characters, etc, etc, etc, etc. Lord Tony 07:03, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
"They"? I rewrote the first three sections in their entirety, and so far I've gotten no complaints on my humor and style. I'd be interested to know what bothers you the most about the way I described the characters..? Elvis 15:06, 11 March 2012 (EDT)

This article is looking messy, remove something.

I've compiled a list of choices to delete so we can make this article less messy.


  • All the shitload of images on the right side.
  • The images in the ponyfag gallery (don't touch the Rule 34 gallery as it isn't compiled of crap).
  • We already have the exact same ponyfag gallery in the brony thread.

Lord Tony 07:14, 11 March 2012 (EDT)

The derpygeddon section could probably be moved to the Brony article, or a Derpy article could be made.
I cuntpasted the gallery from here to there hoping that someone would remove the images that didn't belong. Thank you for that. That gallery can probably be removed from this article now, and most of the images on the right can probably be moved to the Brony article as well. --zaiger (talk) 11:01, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
Wouldn't a Derpy article make it more viable for the horsefuckers to slip in and start editing wars? -Enig of Norway - Talk Haus 11:32, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
Eng's right. Besides, I doubt we'd be able to fill an article with information on a single BG character with a single major event around it. --RTD 12:00, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
  • Why do we need our own derpy article? There is nothing to fucking talk about. Lord Tony 21:06, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
Because we fucking can. There's no limit on articles. People can do what they want, and we have a lot worse shit than Derpy. Go look at Category:People and tell me 90% of those fucks are better. Mike the Great (talk) 21:10, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
So what can we add in the derpy article? 1-2 sentences and a shitload of pictures? This is not a pony 4chan board. Lord Tony 21:15, 11 March 2012 (EDT)
  • Oh and not to mention Derpy is a fucking pony, so derpy having it's own article doesn't make sense. Lord Tony 21:16, 11 March 2012 (EDT)

Since your idea is so awesome I turned it into an article. http://encyclopediadramatica.se/DerpyHooves Lord Tony 00:56, 12 March 2012 (EDT)

knock it off. -hipcrime 00:58, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
Knock what off? It's just bronies being bronies, right? Lord Tony 01:00, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
Be sure to remove the content so we don't have duplicates, and thanks a lot. You do quality work when you're mad. Mike the Great (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
Calm down sugacube! Lord Tony 01:02, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
my mistake. i was going to request that you plz confine your nerd rage to the talkpages but, please carry on. this is funny. -hipcrime 01:03, 12 March 2012 (EDT)

Confine your pony boner, Hipcrime. I made the article of your favorite pony pal Derpy Hooves. Lord Tony 01:09, 12 March 2012 (EDT)

Lord Brony



Lord Brony



Lord Brony



Lord Brony



Lord Brony



Lord Brony



Lord Brony
Elvis 11:17, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
  • Elvis you are a complete fagggot and I am not saying this just because of the rainbow text. Lord Tony 12:57, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
http://i.imgur.com/krnsI.png Elvis 13:38, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
lol so much buttpain for a show for little girls ☭⚡⚡ 13:46, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
I can't tell, is Elvis taking the term "Hard Gay Horsefucker" to the heart, or is Tony? -Enig of Norway - Talk Haus 16:27, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
if your name is on this page, you are a brony. -hipcrime 17:39, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
If your name is "hipcrime", your arguement is invalid. -=-Enig of Norway - Talk Haus 20:04, 12 March 2012 (EDT)
if you made a typo, your argument is invalid. -hipcrime 20:06, 12 March 2012 (EDT)

You are a closet brony if you: 1.) Ever edited a pony related article 2.) Ever went on the discussion page of the MLP article 3.) Ever seen an episode of MLP 4.) Know the definition of a brony 5.) Get butthurt over pony related shit on ED 6.) Claim to hate ponies/bronies 7.) Repeat your hatred a few hundred times 8.) Have ever accidentally saw goatse 9.) Have ever purposefully saw goatse 10.) Are an ED member. Now you know! Alanthewhite 22:56, 12 March 2012 (EDT)

SPAGHETTI LEVELS REACHING CRITICAL MASS

Watch as neckbeards ogle their little girly toys. Submitting this video for review. Vaporeon 21:56, 12 March 2012 (EDT)

Load video
YouTube

Part two with extra spaghetti levels of autism. Vaporeon 15:34, 13 March 2012 (EDT)

Load video
YouTube
We have a new article for this now. This article is about the show. ALso back seat editing Mike the Great (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2012 (EDT)

Some fag wants to kill himself.

http://boards.4chan.org/mlp/res/657164

Quick look at it before it 404s! Lord Tony 00:46, 18 March 2012 (EDT)

why are you on /mlp/? Mike the Great (talk) 00:47, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
Hoping to troll around but they post so much they don't see it. Lord Tony 01:00, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
You've got issues. Mike the Great (talk) 01:12, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
did anyone cap it? -hipcrime 01:01, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
404'd lol. ~Oblique 01:02, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
boooo --zaiger (talk) 01:23, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
How does it 404 if /mlp/ is the slowest board on the site? – NuclearDuckie 09:15, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
Here's hoping moot calls in the nukes on that place in April. -=-Enig of Norway - Talk Haus 11:15, 18 March 2012 (EDT)
It 404'd because moot or someone else deleted it. Lord Tony 12:06, 18 March 2012 (EDT)

Nice gallery.

Gallery looks pretty sexy now. Lord Tony 15:15, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

i came. -hipcrime 16:32, 30 March 2012 (EDT)
same ♥♥♥ 17:46, 30 March 2012 (EDT)
Retrieved from "http://encyclopediadramatica.gay/index.php?title=Talk:My_Little_Pony/2012-Jan-Mar&oldid=487139"