Freedom of speech: Difference between revisions
imported>CrackRabbit |
imported>Jmariofan7 No edit summary |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
The [[Americunt]] government still manages to weasel its way around the First Amendment to control the flow of information from the media. Is this a [[conspiracy theory]]? Reptilian overlords? The Illumanti? No, it is something far more simple and insidious, Press passes. A press pass is a document that has shown an individual is clear to enter an area that they normally wouldn't be allowed to. It gives reporters the ability to attend meetings in the White House with the Press Secretary and other press events. So while mainstream media is on-board with the government by being major corporate interests who help fund those individuals get into office, individual reporters are kept in check with press passes. If a reporter asks the Press Secretary or a politician a tough question that puts them on the spot or is "out of bounds", they will have their pass for those events revoked. Usually this will be the start of the end of that reporters career since all major media outlets are owned by a handful of conglomerate corporations. How could a system like this possibly go wrong? | The [[Americunt]] government still manages to weasel its way around the First Amendment to control the flow of information from the media. Is this a [[conspiracy theory]]? Reptilian overlords? The Illumanti? No, it is something far more simple and insidious, Press passes. A press pass is a document that has shown an individual is clear to enter an area that they normally wouldn't be allowed to. It gives reporters the ability to attend meetings in the White House with the Press Secretary and other press events. So while mainstream media is on-board with the government by being major corporate interests who help fund those individuals get into office, individual reporters are kept in check with press passes. If a reporter asks the Press Secretary or a politician a tough question that puts them on the spot or is "out of bounds", they will have their pass for those events revoked. Usually this will be the start of the end of that reporters career since all major media outlets are owned by a handful of conglomerate corporations. How could a system like this possibly go wrong? | ||
Take for example the war in [[Iraq]]. Everyone howls for the blood of the [[Republicans|Neo-Conservatives]] and [[W]] because of entering a war under false pretenses. Bull-fucking-shit! The Republican party may be evil enough to do so, but the entire party couldn't form a single braincell if their life depended on it. The [[media]] is the true culprit. And by being hosed with simple things like press passes, it makes reporters fearful of their careers and futures thus preventing them from asking hard questions to our Overlords. Questions like, "Can we see the evidence before millions of people suffer and die that justifies going to war?" | Take for example the war in [[Iraq]]. Everyone howls for the blood of the [[Republicans|Neo-Conservatives]] and [[W]] because of entering a war under false pretenses. Bull-fucking-shit! The Republican party may be evil enough to do so, but the entire party couldn't form a single braincell if their life depended on it. The [[media]] is the true culprit. And by being hosed with simple things like press passes, it makes reporters fearful of their careers and futures thus preventing them from asking hard questions to our Overlords. Questions like, "Can we see the evidence before millions of people suffer and die that justifies going to war?" The flow of information pertaining to them needs to be freely available. Not controlled by the people that said information is critical of. [[lol|Yet we live in a free country.]] | ||
===Individuals=== | ===Individuals=== | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
[[OTI|On the internet]], the First Amendment is 101% likely to be invoked completely fucking wrongly by someone that hasn't taken the time to actually read the motherfucker. Anywhere that there are stupid fucking attention whores that have no idea what they are talking about, there will undoubtedly be a call to the First Amendment for protection. | [[OTI|On the internet]], the First Amendment is 101% likely to be invoked completely fucking wrongly by someone that hasn't taken the time to actually read the motherfucker. Anywhere that there are stupid fucking attention whores that have no idea what they are talking about, there will undoubtedly be a call to the First Amendment for protection. | ||
Like all other freedoms, [[truth|free speech ceases to exist once you are on the internet]]. Unlike real life, every single website on the internet has an owner who wields total power over everything passing through said site. The internet could thus be considered a collection of despotic nation-states, each ruled by its own [[Mods| | Like all other freedoms, [[truth|free speech ceases to exist once you are on the internet]]. Unlike real life, every single website on the internet has an owner who wields total power over everything passing through said site. The internet could thus be considered a collection of despotic nation-states, each ruled by its own [[Mods|“tyrant”]]. Knowing this, it is clear that freedoms as we know them do not exist on the internet, and yet most people insist on believing just the opposite. | ||
If you are getting ready to invoke the First Amendment to stand up to your | If you are getting ready to invoke the First Amendment to stand up to your “brutal oppression” by that faggot moderator at whatever website he banned you from, or from a thirteen-year-old kid who won't shut the fuck up and keeps blabbering some stupid bullshit that no one cares about, ask yourself: | ||
#Is my oppressor the United States lawmaking body? | #Is my oppressor the United States lawmaking body? | ||
#Is my oppressor trying to form a law? | #Is my oppressor trying to form a law? | ||
Revision as of 22:36, 7 September 2021
Honorary Ed Lolington
Freedom of speech
is part of a series on
Internet Law.
[With Liberty and Drama for All]
- Detective
- E-lawyers
- Internet court
- Internet guilty
- Internet jail
- Internet lawsuit
- Internet license
- Internet military
- Internet money
- Internet police
- Internet Settlement
- Internet trial
- Internet Vigilante Group
- Legal action
Laws
Internet Crimes
Internet Defenses
Other Topics
Case Law
We are all qualified attorneys at lol and every word of these articles is sound legal advice.
Missing something? You can help by adding moar!
At least 100 years ago, people did not have or know the concept of free speech and were only allowed to speak in 5-word sentences. Then they found out how much fun it was to yell "Fire!" in a crowded room and watch everyone stampede over each other to get out. Death and lulz ensued and freedom of speech was born.
Freedom of speech means you can say whatever you want, whenever you want, to whomever you want without any repercussions. It is invoked in flame wars to act like a retard under the guise of protecting "basic civil liberties".
The First Amendment
Over At least 100, the Americunts forefathers took a break from the slaughter of Injuns and beating their slaves to decide that all land-owning white men who were allowed to vote had certain inalienable rights. These rights were established as the Bill of Rights and was the beginning of the U.S. constitution. The first which gives us the freedom to say whatever the hell we want no matter how stupid or offensive it may be without THE GOVERNMENT being able to do shit about it. So you can go fuck yourself you pussy faggot! Non-government entities, though, can still make you GTFO. Just read the fucking thing:
—The First Amendment |
The First Amendment protects us all from evil by guaranteeing our right to:
- Anything on 4chan
- Freedom of Assembly
- Create & share amusing racial epithets!
- Freedom of the Press
- Freedom of Religion
- Petition the Government for redress of our grievances
- Political dissent & Mod Sass
In addition, the First Amendment also prohibits a particular religion from being forced upon us by the State, which is a bit different from how Americunts view it.
Freedom of the Press
The "freedom of the press" (also granted by the First Amendment) originally referred to the right to publish their political views and opinions. These days, we use the internet for this, rather than printed pamphlets. No matter what damn fool ideas you have: whether you're a 9/11 conspiracy nut, member of the KKK, or Zionist, you have a basic right to get the word out there.
In the United States
The following video will enrage military, former military, military families, and anyone with a friend that has ever wore a military uniform. How's them apples Rightards!?
Large-scale
The Americunts government still manages to weasel its way around the First Amendment to control the flow of information from the media. Is this a conspiracy theory? Reptilian overlords? The Illumanti? No, it is something far more simple and insidious, Press passes. A press pass is a document that has shown an individual is clear to enter an area that they normally wouldn't be allowed to. It gives reporters the ability to attend meetings in the White House with the Press Secretary and other press events. So while mainstream media is on-board with the government by being major corporate interests who help fund those individuals get into office, individual reporters are kept in check with press passes. If a reporter asks the Press Secretary or a politician a tough question that puts them on the spot or is "out of bounds", they will have their pass for those events revoked. Usually this will be the start of the end of that reporters career since all major media outlets are owned by a handful of conglomerate corporations. How could a system like this possibly go wrong?
Take for example the war in Iraq. Everyone howls for the blood of the Neo-Conservatives and W because of entering a war under false pretenses. Bull-fucking-shit! The Republican party may be evil enough to do so, but the entire party couldn't form a single braincell if their life depended on it. The media is the true culprit. And by being hosed with simple things like press passes, it makes reporters fearful of their careers and futures thus preventing them from asking hard questions to our Overlords. Questions like, "Can we see the evidence before millions of people suffer and die that justifies going to war?" The flow of information pertaining to them needs to be freely available. Not controlled by the people that said information is critical of. Yet we live in a free country.
Individuals
Because free speech is distributed equally in the U.S., whenever anyone is butthurt by someone else, they will not stop talking about it. Freedom of speech is protected by the Bill of Rights, but is ignored like the rest of it. For example, the first right is:
—Buddha | ||
and yet they make laws every day.
On the internet
On the internet, the First Amendment is 101% likely to be invoked completely fucking wrongly by someone that hasn't taken the time to actually read the motherfucker. Anywhere that there are stupid fucking attention whores that have no idea what they are talking about, there will undoubtedly be a call to the First Amendment for protection.
Like all other freedoms, free speech ceases to exist once you are on the internet. Unlike real life, every single website on the internet has an owner who wields total power over everything passing through said site. The internet could thus be considered a collection of despotic nation-states, each ruled by its own “tyrant”. Knowing this, it is clear that freedoms as we know them do not exist on the internet, and yet most people insist on believing just the opposite.
If you are getting ready to invoke the First Amendment to stand up to your “brutal oppression” by that faggot moderator at whatever website he banned you from, or from a thirteen-year-old kid who won't shut the fuck up and keeps blabbering some stupid bullshit that no one cares about, ask yourself:
- Is my oppressor the United States lawmaking body?
- Is my oppressor trying to form a law?
- Is my oppressor a United States lawmaking body trying to form a law?
- Is my understanding of the First Amendment solid?
If the answer to any of these questions is no, then you should probably shut the fuck up and follow the rules you agreed to when you joined. Nowhere in the Bill of Rights or Jewnited States of Americunts Constitution are your e-feelings protected. In fact, the idea that they would be is utterly laughable when you consider the Americunts way of life (Only in America would someone sue a fast-food chain for making them fat).
Who hates it?
Conservatives
Generally speaking, Conservatives consider themselves to be the sole arbiters of the Constitution. They consider our founding document to be divinely inspired and intended to be taken and read literally. They also unilaterally oppose any form of extrapolation from, or alternate application of, the principles set forth therein and consider these efforts to be little more than an illegal, extra-constitutional excess. Conservatives say the First Amendment does not apply when:
- You are speaking out against a Republican President.
- Expressing displeasure with a US war in general, or the conduct of the United States Military in particular.
- Offering an opinion which favorably portrays Sand niggers, Palestine or nearly anyone who is unfortunate enough to exist above our oil.
In fact Conservatives were recently able to codify many of these objections into law! (See the Patriot Act).
Liberals
Liberalism don't have as much of a problem with mangling any part of our founding document, provided said mangling adds value to their hollow, atheistic, inconsistent existence. While they do seem to have a passing fancy for the First Amendment in particular, they will quickly chuck it under the bus if:
- Said speech is "ZOMG! Hateful!" or "Offensive" towards anyone except for Conservatives or Christians.
- The speech suggests certain US laws be enforced, or imply that certain minority groups are anything less than wholesome and pure.
- The speech in question is critical of valuable artistic expression.
Scientology
The $cientology already brainwashes and destroys people while sheltering itself under the First Amendment. L. Ron Hubbard proposed early on to infiltrate sections of government under $cientology, and they did with quite some success.
Socialists
Socialist believe "free speech in the sense used in bourgeois capitalist 'democracies' means the right to undermine social justice and erode the social solidarity of the working class." But they're socialists, so what the fuck do they know about free speech?
Social Justice Warriors
A subset of the Liberals, they want at any cost to show how women, LGBTQ communities and PoC are still suffering from a system that handicapped them as they think it solely serves to benefit white heterosexual men, and the only way to get even attain equality is by enforcing a set of illogical rules which only goal is to have the all the privileges and rights modern society offers without doing any of its duties.
They want to silence anyone who has seen through their immature tactics and preposterous demands by creating a shield against any valid criticism they could get.
Thus, Social Justice will try to pose as victims of unwanted bullying and, at the same time, labeling any dissenting comments as death threats, racist, misogynistic, transphobic statements or rape attempts. Also they will demand the inalienable right to say whatever the fuck they want (no matter how impossible, ludicrous or stupid it can sounds) but they will not recognize the same right to any person who dares to criticize them.
Jews
Unique to the Jew is an uncanny ability to combine the Arab xenophobia of the Conservative's, with the Liberal's sensitivity towards offending other types of minorities, easily making Jews the ultimate First Amendment hypocrites.
Niggers
For niggers, the First Amendment exists solely to prevent anyone except niggers from using the word "Nigger". While this may seem hypocritical at first one must always bear in mind that Niggers are little more than a lightly evolved ape-species and mostly illiterate. As such, their imperfect understanding of the Constitution can be attributed to the uniqueness of their biology.
Arabs
Much like the Niggers, Sand niggers also take a very narrow view of the freedom the First Amendment guarantees. While generally supportive of their own right to assemble, speak freely and the freedom to choose Islam as their religion, Arabs can become violent (and even spontaneously combust!) when other groups attempt to assert the same rights for themselves.
Autists
Much like the Niggers, Arabs and the Jews, autists hate it when people use their disability as an insult or a joke, they end up going to extreme cases as bitching and moaning on the internet by saying that autism isn't an insult or a joke, not knowing that their words aren't being heard. Considering that we just hear screeching instead. Truth be told, most autists don't actually have freedom of speech. Because they can't fucking talk.
FAQs
- Virginia:
- So I can rule internets nao? Cuz mootie banned me and stole my first amendment?!
- ED Help Desk:
- LOL! No, Virginia... Here, on the interbutts, the First Amendment is a complex thing!
How to explain it to you... Hummm...
Ok, try this!
Every weekend, we EDiots line our pets up on mom & dad's coffee table and lecture them on our politics.
Now pay attention Virginia, because this is key - That's our coffee table, in our living room!
(BTW, we had our pets stuffed because they were poor listeners.)
Likewise, Moot lectures his pets too! But on his coffee table, just like us!
(Except he stuffs his pets with cock instead.)
Now the Constitution says I have a right to lecture my pets on my table, and it also says he has a right to lecture his pets on his table.
But! I don't have a First Amendment right to lecture his pets on his table.
Nor, does he have a right to talk to my coffee table.
(Like it could hear him anyway.)
The Constitution says we aren't obligated to provide a venue for any of this retard bullshit.
I hope that helps, dear...
- ED Help Desk:
Yes... that's the Constitution, Virginia.
The First Amendment is what made this country great!
Also, cocks!
Long live our First Amendment!
Gallery
-
A free speech advocate. (Typical)
-
Petitioning for Redress of Grievances (Also Typical)
-
Kramer, doing it right
-
Penn, doing it wrong.
-
Protected Speech.
-
Speech Not Covered by the First Amendment.
-
-
-
See Also
- The Encyclopedia Dramatica and ED Forums, Last bastions of Freedom of Speech EVAR
- 1 for all
- ACLU
- AnonTalk
- Stfu
- You vs. ED
- Jewnited States of Americunts
- $cientology
- Old media
- Freedom
Groups that abuse Freedom of Speech
- Feminist
- Homosexuality (especially furfags)
- Nigger
- Religion
Groups with no Freedom of Speech
External Links
- A Documentary on Media Manipulation - An hour long documentary on media manipulation without normal conspiracy theory bullshit like the Worldwide Masonic Conspiracy and Alex Jones. Very plain and easy to see in simple terms for the average idiot.
| Freedom of speech is part of a series on Language & Communication | |
|---|---|
Languages and Dialects • Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling, Style, and Usage • Rhetorical Strategies • Poetry •
The Politics of Language and Communication • Media • Visual Rhetoric
Click topics to expand |
|
| Freedom of speech is part of a series on serious business |
Serious Concepts
Freedom of speech • Identity theft • Irony • Internet Asshole • Internet celebrity • Internet Disease • Internet drama • Internet humanitarians • Internet Law • Internet lawsuit • E-lawyer • Internet stalking • Internet Tough Guy • Internet Vigilante Group • Operation Falcon Punch • SWATting • Vandalism • World Wide Web Consortium People & Organizations
2cash • Alan Turing • Casey Serin • David Hockey • Dear Cis People • Doxbin • Fast Eddie • Grace Saunders • Hallcats Squadron • Jessi Slaughter • Mary Bell • Meek Mill • Kittens • Maja Schmidt • Missy • Niggest Crook Force • Psychopath • Vloggerheads • WEB SHERIFF |
|---|
 |
Freedom of speech is part of a series on Taking Down ED [Do It Faggot] |
 | ||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
Freedom of speech is part of a series on Visit the Trolls Portal for complete coverage. |